z-logo
Premium
Cysteine Radical/Metal Ion Adducts: A Gas‐Phase Structural Elucidation and Reactivity Study
Author(s) -
Lesslie Michael,
Lau Justin KaiChi,
Lawler John T.,
Siu K. W. Michael,
Steinmetz Vincent,
Maître Philippe,
Hopkinson Alan C.,
Ryzhov Victor
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
chempluschem
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.801
H-Index - 61
ISSN - 2192-6506
DOI - 10.1002/cplu.201500558
Subject(s) - chemistry , infrared multiphoton dissociation , radical , adduct , radical ion , dissociation (chemistry) , photochemistry , alkali metal , bond dissociation energy , density functional theory , reactivity (psychology) , ion , computational chemistry , organic chemistry , medicine , alternative medicine , pathology
The formation and investigation of sulfur‐based cysteine radicals cationized by a group 1A metal ion or Ag + in the gas phase are reported. Gas‐phase ion–molecule reactions (IMR) and infrared multiple‐photon dissociation (IRMPD) spectroscopy revealed that the Li + , Na + , and K + adducts of the cysteine radical remain S‐based radicals as initially formed. Theoretical calculations for the three alkali metal ions found that the lowest‐energy isomers are C α ‐based radicals, but they are not observed experimentally owing to the barriers associated with the hydrogen‐atom transfer. A mechanism for the S‐to‐C α radical rearrangement in the metal ion complexes was proposed, and the relative energies of the associated energy barriers were found to be Li + >Na + >K + at all levels of theory. Relative to the B3LYP functional, other levels of calculation gave significantly higher barriers (by 35–40 kJ mol −1 at MP2 and 44–47 kJ mol −1 at the CCSD level) using the same basis set. Unlike the alkali metal adducts, the cysteine radical/Ag + complex rearranged from the S‐based radical to an unreactive species as indicated by IMRs and IRMPD spectroscopy. This is consistent with the Ag + /cysteine radical complex having a lower S‐to‐C α radical conversion barrier, as predicted by the MP2 and CCSD levels of theory.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here