z-logo
Premium
Comparative Investigation of the Ionicity of Aprotic and Protic Ionic Liquids in Molecular Solvents by using Conductometry and NMR Spectroscopy
Author(s) -
Thawarkar Sachin,
Khupse Nageshwar D.,
Kumar Anil
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
chemphyschem
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.016
H-Index - 140
eISSN - 1439-7641
pISSN - 1439-4235
DOI - 10.1002/cphc.201501156
Subject(s) - ionic liquid , chemistry , tetrafluoroborate , ethylene glycol , solvation , inorganic chemistry , ionic bonding , ionic conductivity , diffusion , nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy , ion , organic chemistry , electrolyte , thermodynamics , physics , catalysis , electrode
Electrical conductivity ( σ ), viscosity ( η ), and self‐diffusion coefficient ( D ) measurements of binary mixtures of aprotic and protic imidazolium‐based ionic liquids with water, dimethyl sulfoxide, and ethylene glycol were measured from 293.15 to 323.15 K. The temperature dependence study reveals typical Arrhenius behavior. The ionicities of aprotic ionic liquids were observed to be higher than those of protic ionic liquids in these solvents. The aprotic ionic liquid, 1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, [bmIm][BF 4 ], displays 100 % ionicity in both water and ethylene glycol. The protic ionic liquids in both water and ethylene glycol are classed as good ionic candidates, whereas in DMSO they are classed as having a poor ionic nature. The solvation dynamics of the ionic species of the ionic liquids are illustrated on the basis of the 1 H NMR chemical shifts of the ionic liquids. The self‐diffusion coefficients D of the cation and anion of [HmIm][CH 3 COO] in D 2 O and in [D 6 ]DMSO are determined by using 1 H nuclei with pulsed field gradient spin‐echo NMR spectroscopy.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here