Premium
DFT Methods to Study the Reaction Mechanism of Iridium‐Catalyzed Hydrogenation of Olefins: Which Functional Should be Chosen?
Author(s) -
Sun Yihua,
Chen Hui
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
chemphyschem
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.016
H-Index - 140
eISSN - 1439-7641
pISSN - 1439-4235
DOI - 10.1002/cphc.201500817
Subject(s) - iridium , catalysis , reaction mechanism , mechanism (biology) , chemistry , density functional theory , computational chemistry , photochemistry , combinatorial chemistry , organic chemistry , physics , quantum mechanics
To enable the selection of more accurate computational methods for the future theoretical exploration of the reaction mechanism of Ir‐catalyzed olefin hydrogenation, we compared high‐level ab initio coupled cluster and DFT calculations with a simplified model of Pfaltz's Ir/P,N‐type catalyst for all four previously proposed Ir I /Ir III and Ir III /Ir V mechanisms. Through the systematic assessment of the DFT performances, the DFT empirical dispersion correction (DFT‐D3) is found to be indispensable for improving the accuracy of relative energies between the Ir I /Ir III and Ir III /Ir V mechanisms. After including the DFT‐D3 correction, the three best performing density functionals (DFs) are B2‐PLYP, BP86, and TPSSh. In these recommended DFs, the computationally more expensive double‐hybrid functional B2‐PLYP‐D3 has a balanced and outstanding performance for calculations of the reaction barriers, reaction energies, and energy gaps between different mechanisms, whereas the less costly BP86‐D3 and TPSSh‐D3 methods have outstanding, but relatively less uniform performances.