z-logo
Premium
Autoionization of Molecular Hydrogen: Where do the Fano Lineshapes Go?
Author(s) -
Palacios Alicia,
Feist Johannes,
GonzálezCastrillo Alberto,
SanzVicario José Luis,
Martín Fernando
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
chemphyschem
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.016
H-Index - 140
eISSN - 1439-7641
pISSN - 1439-4235
DOI - 10.1002/cphc.201200974
Subject(s) - autoionization , photoionization , attosecond , fano plane , atomic physics , ionization , physics , electron , fano resonance , chemistry , molecular physics , plasmon , quantum mechanics , laser , ion , ultrashort pulse , mathematics , pure mathematics
Atomic autoionization following photoabsorption is a typical example of quantum interferences governed by electron–electron correlation. Coherence between direct photoionization and autoionization paths results in “Fano profiles”, widely explored in atoms in the last 60 years. The advent of femto‐ and attosecond laser technology made time‐resolved images of the delayed electron ejection in autoionization accessible, leading to the reemergence of such studies in atomic systems. The counterpart molecular phenomena show the richness, as well as the complexity, added by nuclear motion, which may proceed on similar time scales. However, Fano profiles are usually absent in measured molecular photoionization cross sections and an unequivocal parametrization of molecular autoionization signatures, similar to that introduced by Fano in atoms [U. Fano, Phys. Rev. 1961 , 124 , 1866] has not yet been achieved. In this work we introduce a simple semiclassical model that accounts for all the features observed in H 2 photoionization and demonstrate that the interference structures observed in dissociative ionization spectra are almost exclusively due to the phase accumulated in the nuclear motion. Furthermore, we show that the temporal build‐up of these structures in the energy‐differential cross sections is also determined by nuclear motion. We validate our models by comparing with full‐dimensional ab initio calculations solving the time‐dependent Schrödinger equation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here