Premium
Photodissociation of 1,2‐Dibromoethylene at 248 nm: Br 2 Molecular Elimination Probed by Cavity Ring‐Down Absorption Spectroscopy
Author(s) -
Chang YuanPin,
Lee PingChen,
Lin KingChuen,
Huang C. H.,
Sun B. J.,
Chang A. H. H.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
chemphyschem
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.016
H-Index - 140
eISSN - 1439-7641
pISSN - 1439-4235
DOI - 10.1002/cphc.200700861
Subject(s) - intersystem crossing , chemistry , photodissociation , ground state , spectroscopy , absorption spectroscopy , quantum yield , population , ab initio , internal conversion , triplet state , photochemistry , excited state , analytical chemistry (journal) , atomic physics , spectral line , molecule , fluorescence , singlet state , physics , demography , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , astronomy , sociology , chromatography
The Br 2 elimination channel is probed for 1,2‐C 2 H 2 Br 2 in the B ${{}^3{\rm{\Pi }}_{ou}^ + }$ –X ${{}^1{\rm{\Sigma }}_g^ + }$ transition upon irradiation at 248 nm by using cavity ring‐down absorption spectroscopy (CRDS). The nascent vibrational population ratio of Br 2 ( v =1)/Br 2 ( v =0) is obtained to be 0.7±0.2, thus indicating that the Br 2 fragment is produced in hot vibrational states. The obtained Br 2 products are anticipated to result primarily from photodissociation of the ground‐state cis isomer via four‐center elimination or from cis / trans isomers via three‐center elimination, each mechanism involving a transition state that has a BrBr distance much larger than that of ground‐state Br 2 . According to ab initio potential energy calculations, the pathways that lead to Br 2 elimination may proceed either through the electronic ground state by internal conversion or through the triplet state by intersystem crossing. Temperature‐dependence measurements are examined, thereby supporting the pathway that involves internal conversion—which was excluded previously by using product translational spectroscopy (PTS). The quantum yield for the Br 2 elimination reaction is determined to be 0.12±0.1, being substantially contributed by the ground‐state Br 2 product. The discrepancy of this value from that (of 0.2) obtained by PTS may rise from the lack of measurements in probing the triplet‐state Br 2 product.