Premium
Physico‐Chemical Characterization of Nanofiltration Membranes
Author(s) -
Boussu Katleen,
De Baerdemaeker Jérémie,
Dauwe Charles,
Weber Marc,
Lynn Kelvin G.,
Depla Diederik,
Aldea Steliana,
Vankelecom Ivo F. J.,
Vandecasteele Carlo,
Van der Bruggen Bart
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
chemphyschem
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.016
H-Index - 140
eISSN - 1439-7641
pISSN - 1439-4235
DOI - 10.1002/cphc.200600512
Subject(s) - nanofiltration , membrane , x ray photoelectron spectroscopy , attenuated total reflection , chemical engineering , polyamide , porosity , analytical chemistry (journal) , characterization (materials science) , materials science , chemistry , fourier transform infrared spectroscopy , layer (electronics) , chromatography , polymer chemistry , nanotechnology , composite material , biochemistry , engineering
Abstract This study presents a methodology for an in‐depth characterization of six representative commercial nanofiltration membranes. Laboratory‐made polyethersulfone membranes are included for reference. Besides the physical characterization [molecular weight cut‐off (MWCO), surface charge, roughness and hydrophobicity], the membranes are also studied for their chemical composition [attenuated total reflectance Fourier spectroscopy (ATR‐FTIR) and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)] and porosity [positron annihilation spectroscopy (PAS)]. The chemical characterization indicates that all membranes are composed of at least two different layers. The presence of an additional third layer is proved and studied for membranes with a polyamide top layer. PAS experiments, in combination with FIB (focused ion beam) images, show that these membranes also have a thinner and a less porous skin layer (upper part of the top layer). In the skin layer, two different pore sizes are observed for all commercial membranes: a pore size of 1.25–1.55 Å as well as a pore size of 3.20–3.95 Å (both depending on the membrane type). Thus, the pore size distribution in nanofiltration membranes is bimodal, in contrast to the generally accepted log‐normal distribution. Although the pore sizes are rather similar for all commercial membranes, their pore volume fraction and hence their porosity differ significantly.