Premium
Comparison of workload consolidation algorithms for cloud data centers
Author(s) -
Ponto René,
Kecskeméti Gábor,
Mann Zoltán Á.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
concurrency and computation: practice and experience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.309
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1532-0634
pISSN - 1532-0626
DOI - 10.1002/cpe.6138
Subject(s) - workload , computer science , cloud computing , consolidation (business) , particle swarm optimization , population , metaheuristic , data center , algorithm , mathematical optimization , operations research , engineering , mathematics , demography , accounting , sociology , business , operating system
Workload consolidation is an important method for the efficient operation of cloud data centers, impacting important quality attributes such as resource utilization and power consumption. Many different approaches have been proposed for workload consolidation, but few comparative studies were executed to date. Therefore, it is unclear which of the proposed approaches work best in which situation. In this article, we present a comprehensive simulation‐based comparison of five workload consolidation techniques. We introduce a general framework for workload consolidation techniques to the DISSECT‐CF simulator to foster the development and comparison of efficient data center consolidation algorithms. We use this framework to evaluate the effectiveness of a first fit best fit decreasing heuristic, a custom heuristic, and three population‐based metaheuristics (genetic algorithm, artificial bee colony, and particle swarm optimization). The evaluation is based on a wide variety of real‐world workload traces. The five algorithms are compared in terms of total energy consumption, the duration of the simulation, and the number of migrations. Based on the results, there is no generally best consolidation technique. The results deliver insight into the pros and cons of the algorithms as well as the impact of different parameters. In particular, the results show that population‐based metaheuristics do not offer a significant gain in terms of solution quality to compensate for the increased simulation time.