Premium
A comparison of using Taverna and BPEL in building scientific workflows: the case of caGrid
Author(s) -
Tan Wei,
Missier Paolo,
Foster Ian,
Madduri Ravi,
De Roure David,
Goble Carole
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
concurrency and computation: practice and experience
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.309
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1532-0634
pISSN - 1532-0626
DOI - 10.1002/cpe.1547
Subject(s) - workflow , computer science , business process execution language , world wide web , data science , software engineering , web service , service oriented architecture , database
When the emergence of ‘service‐oriented science,’ the need arises to orchestrate multiple services to facilitate scientific investigation—that is, to create ‘science workflows.’ We present here our findings in providing a workflow solution for the caGrid service‐based grid infrastructure. We choose BPEL and Taverna as candidates, and compare their usability in the lifecycle of a scientific workflow, including workflow composition, execution, and result analysis. Our experience shows that BPEL as an imperative language offers a comprehensive set of modeling primitives for workflows of all flavors; whereas Taverna offers a dataflow model and a more compact set of primitives that facilitates dataflow modeling and pipelined execution. We hope that this comparison study not only helps researchers to select a language or tool that meets their specific needs, but also offers some insight into how a workflow language and tool can fulfill the requirement of the scientific community. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.