z-logo
Premium
The Bioequivalence of Two Peficitinib Formulations, and the Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics of Peficitinib: Two‐Way Crossover Studies of a Single Dose of 150 mg Peficitinib in Healthy Volunteers
Author(s) -
Shibata Mai,
Toyoshima Junko,
Kaneko Yuichiro,
Oda Kazuo,
Kiyota Tsuyoshi,
Kambayashi Atsushi,
Nishimura Tetsuya
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
clinical pharmacology in drug development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.711
H-Index - 22
eISSN - 2160-7648
pISSN - 2160-763X
DOI - 10.1002/cpdd.843
Subject(s) - bioequivalence , medicine , bioavailability , pharmacokinetics , crossover study , confidence interval , adverse effect , piperine , traditional medicine , pharmacology , alternative medicine , pathology , placebo
The marketed tablet formulation of peficitinib differs from the tablet used during the clinical trials. The bioequivalence of the marketed formulation and developmental tablet, and the food effect on the marketed formulation, were analyzed in 2 Japanese open‐label, randomized, 2‐way crossover studies in healthy male volunteers. Volunteers received a single oral dose of the marketed 150‐mg peficitinib tablet under fasted conditions (bioequivalence), and under fed or fasted conditions (food effect). Bioequivalence was compared with the developmental 150‐mg tablet. Samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected before dose and ≤72 hours after dose. Safety assessments included adverse events, vital signs, and laboratory variables. In total, 40 and 18 subjects were randomized to the bioequivalence and food effect studies, respectively. The 2 peficitinib formulations were bioequivalent (90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for C max and AUC t of peficitinib were within predefined limits of 0.8 to 1.25). The AUC last and the C max of the marketed tablet were 36.8% and 56.4% higher, respectively, under fed versus fasted conditions. Peficitinib was well tolerated. The marketed 150‐mg tablet formulation of peficitinib was bioequivalent to the developmental 150‐mg formulation, with no discernible safety differences. Bioavailability increased under fed conditions with the marketed tablet formulation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here