A lower‐epiperimetric inequality for area‐minimizing surfaces

The epiperimetric inequality introduced by E. R. Reifenberg in [3] gives a rate of decay at a point for the decreasing k ‐density of area of an area‐minimizing integral k ‐cycle. While dilating the cycle at that point, this rate of decay holds once the configuration is close to a tangent cone configuration and above the limiting density corresponding to that configuration. This is why we propose to call the Reifenberg epiperimetric inequality an upper‐epiperimetric inequality. A direct consequence of this upper‐epiperimetric inequality is the statement that any point possesses a unique tangent cone. The upper‐epiperimetric inequality was proven by B. White in [5] for area‐minimizing 2‐cycles in ℝ n . In the present paper we introduce the notion of a lower‐epiperimetric inequality. This inequality gives this time a rate of decay for the decreasing k ‐density of area of an area‐minimizing integral k ‐cycle, while dilating the cycle at a point once the configuration is close to a tangent cone configuration and below the limiting density corresponding to that configuration. Our main result in the present paper is to prove the lower‐epiperimetric inequality for area‐minimizing 2‐cycles in ℝ n . As a consequence of this inequality we prove the “splitting before tilting” phenomenon for calibrated 2‐rectifiable cycles, which plays a crucial role in the proof of the regularity of 1‐1 integral currents in [4]. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.