z-logo
Premium
Visual determination of suprathreshold color‐difference tolerances using probit analysis
Author(s) -
Berns Roy S.,
Alman David H.,
Reniff Lisa,
Snyder Gregory D.,
BaloRosen Mitchell R.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
color research and application
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.393
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1520-6378
pISSN - 0361-2317
DOI - 10.1002/col.5080160505
Subject(s) - color difference , gamut , color space , mathematics , lightness , colorimetry , statistics , metric (unit) , icc profile , artificial intelligence , computer science , color model , computer vision , engineering , image (mathematics) , enhanced data rates for gsm evolution , operations management
As part of a research program to improve the relationship between visual and numerical color‐difference evaluation for industrial colorimetry, a color‐difference tolerance data set for fitting and testing of color‐difference metrics has been extended to include 156 individual color‐tolerance determinations. These tolerances were designed to sample 19 color centers over a surface color gamut with balanced sampling of lightness and chromaticness differences. The tolerance determination procedures emphasized accurate estimation of population visual color‐difference response and rigorous estimation of tolerance precision. Tolerance accuracy was confirmed by excellent agreement of these results and the majority of previous experiments on five color centers selected for CIE color‐difference evaluations. The average uncertainty of the tolerance determinations was ± 11% of the tolerance value at a 2 ó level (95% confidence interval). The completed data set is suitable for estimating the parameters of color‐difference metrics or testing the performance of such metrics. The color tolerances indicated the systematic lack of uniformity of the CIELAB space, in general agreement with previous experiments. A simple modification of the CIELAB color‐difference metric was shown to account for much of the systematic lack of uniformity.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here