Premium
Evaluation of CIELAB‐based colour‐difference formulae using a new dataset
Author(s) -
Kim DongHo,
Cho Eun Kyoung,
Kim Jae Pil
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
color research and application
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.393
H-Index - 62
eISSN - 1520-6378
pISSN - 0361-2317
DOI - 10.1002/col.1052
Subject(s) - lightness , hue , mathematics , color difference , weighting , colour difference , artificial intelligence , significant difference , pattern recognition (psychology) , statistics , computer science , computer vision , optics , physics , enhanced data rates for gsm evolution , acoustics
A new medium‐to‐large colour‐difference data set (mean Δ E * = 8.25) using textile samples and a gray‐scale method has been produced with the aim of comparing currently available datasets, putting particular emphasis on the characteristics of lightness and hue dependencies of major advanced CIELAB‐based colour‐difference formulae. The levels of errors in instrumental colour measurements and in visual assessments were similar to those of previous workers. The random and large scattering nature of the trend of unit lightness tolerances with lightness ( L *) has made it difficult to apply a nonlinear lightness weighting calculation, e.g., that of CMC(ℓ:c). The chroma position corrected hue tolerances have shown a weak trend with hue‐angle ( h ab ) and it can be incorporated in the existing modified CIELAB formula, e.g., CIE94, to improve its performance. Among the six formulae (CIELAB, CMC, CIE94, LCD, BFD‐II, and DCI‐95) tested, the LCD (Leeds Colour Difference) formula that is a modified model of the CIE94 colour‐difference equation has given the best performance. More visual experimental results are still thought to be required for further development in industrial colour‐difference evaluation. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Col Res Appl, 26, 369–375, 2001