Premium
Performance evaluation of surgical techniques for treatment of scapholunate instability in a type II wrist
Author(s) -
LeonardoDiaz Roberto,
AlonsoRasgado Teresa,
JimenezCruz David,
Bailey Colin G.,
Talwalkar Sumedh
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
international journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.741
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 2040-7947
pISSN - 2040-7939
DOI - 10.1002/cnm.3278
Subject(s) - wrist , lunate , scapholunate ligament , ligament , orthodontics , osteoarthritis , lunate bone , articulation (sociology) , anatomy , medicine , alternative medicine , pathology , politics , political science , law
We investigated the performance of three tenodesis techniques, modified Brunelli, Corella, and scapholunate axis (SLAM) methods in repairing scapholunate interosseous ligament (SLIL) disruption for a type II wrist using finite element–based virtual surgery and compared the results with those of a previous investigation for a type I wrist. In addition, a comparison of the carpal mechanics of type I and type II wrists was undertaken in order to elucidate the difference between the two types. For the type II wrist, following simulated SLIL disruption, the Corella reconstruction technique provided a superior outcome, restoring dorsal gap, volar gap, and SL angle to within 3.5%, 7.1%, and 8.4%, respectively, of the intact wrist. Moreover, application of the ligament reconstruction techniques did not significantly alter the motion pattern of the type II and type I wrists. For the type I wrist, SLIL disruption resulted in no contact between scaphoid‐lunate cartilage articulation, whereas for the type II wrist, some contact was maintained. We conclude that the Corella ligamentous reconstruction technique is best able to restore SL gap, angle, and stability following SL ligament injury for both type II and type I wrists and is able to do so without altering wrist kinematics. Our findings also support the view that type I wrists exhibit row behaviour and type II wrists column behaviour. In addition, our analysis suggests that the extra articulation between the lunate and hamate in a type II wrist may help improve stability following SL ligament injury.