Premium
Influence of material property variability on the mechanical behaviour of carotid atherosclerotic plaques: A 3D fluid‐structure interaction analysis
Author(s) -
Yuan Jianmin,
Teng Zhongzhao,
Feng Jiaxuan,
Zhang Yongxue,
Brown Adam J.,
Gillard Jonathan H.,
Jing Zaiping,
Lu Qingsheng
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
international journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.741
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 2040-7947
pISSN - 2040-7939
DOI - 10.1002/cnm.2722
Subject(s) - fibrous cap , modulus , materials science , material properties , thrombus , stiffness , stress (linguistics) , stenosis , biomedical engineering , composite material , medicine , radiology , cardiology , linguistics , philosophy
Summary Mechanical analysis has been shown to be complementary to luminal stenosis in assessing atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability. However, patient‐specific material properties are not available and the effect of material properties variability has not been fully quantified. Media and fibrous cap (FC) strips from carotid endarterectomy samples were classified into hard, intermediate and soft according to their incremental Young's modulus. Lipid and intraplaque haemorrhage/thrombus strips were classified as hard and soft. Idealised geometry‐based 3D fluid‐structure interaction analyses were performed to assess the impact of material property variability in predicting maximum principal stress (Stress‐P 1 ) and stretch (Stretch‐P 1 ). When FC was thick (1000 or 600 µm), Stress‐P 1 at the shoulder was insensitive to changes in material stiffness, whereas Stress‐P 1 at mid FC changed significantly. When FC was thin (200 or 65 µm), high stress concentrations shifted from the shoulder region to mid FC, and Stress‐P 1 became increasingly sensitive to changes in material properties, in particular at mid FC. Regardless of FC thickness, Stretch‐P 1 at these locations was sensitive to changes in material properties. Variability in tissue material properties influences both the location and overall stress/stretch value. This variability needs to be accounted for when interpreting the results of mechanical modelling. © 2015 The Authors. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.