Premium
The upstream boundary condition influences the leaflet opening dynamics in the numerical FSI simulation of an aortic BMHV
Author(s) -
Annerel Sebastiaan,
Degroote Joris,
Claessens Tom,
Segers Patrick,
Verdonck Pascal,
Vierendeels Jan
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
international journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.741
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 2040-7947
pISSN - 2040-7939
DOI - 10.1002/cnm.2470
Subject(s) - upstream (networking) , mechanics , position (finance) , flow (mathematics) , ventricle , computational fluid dynamics , boundary value problem , computer simulation , boundary (topology) , inflow , geometry , geology , physics , engineering , mathematics , mathematical analysis , cardiology , medicine , finance , quantum mechanics , telecommunications , economics
SUMMARY In this paper, the influence of the upstream boundary condition in the numerical simulation of an aortic bileaflet mechanical heart valve (BMHV) is studied. Three three‐dimensional cases with different upstream boundary conditions are compared. The first case consists of a rigid straight tube with a velocity profile at its inlet. In the second case, the upstream geometry is a contracting left ventricle (LV), positioned symmetrically with respect to the valve. In the last case, the LV is positioned asymmetrical with respect to the valve. The cases are used to simulate the same three‐dimensional BMHV. The change in time of the LV volume is calculated such that the flow rate through the valve is identical in each case. The opening dynamics of the BMHV are modelled using fluid–structure interaction. The simulations show that differences occur in the leaflet movement of the three cases. In particular, with the asymmetric LV, one of the leaflets impacts the blocking mechanism at its open position with a 34% higher velocity than when using the velocity profile, and with an 88% higher velocity than in the symmetric LV case. Therefore, when simulating such an impact, the upstream boundary condition needs to be chosen carefully. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.