Premium
A nonrandom interneuronal pattern in the developing frog spinal cord
Author(s) -
Heathcote R. David,
Chen Aileen
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
journal of comparative neurology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.855
H-Index - 209
eISSN - 1096-9861
pISSN - 0021-9967
DOI - 10.1002/cne.903280309
Subject(s) - biology , catecholaminergic , spinal cord , catecholaminergic cell groups , ependyma , population , floor plate , anatomy , hindbrain , neuroscience , immunocytochemistry , microbiology and biotechnology , central nervous system , dopamine , endocrinology , demography , sociology
In the developing spinal cord of the frog, Xenopus laevis , a population of interneurons assumes a pattern that represents a previously undescribed level of organization. Glyoxylic acid treatment and immunocytochemistry show that the neurons contain catecholamines and their synthetic enzyme, tyrosine hydroxylase. Cells are located within the ependymal layer of the floor plate region of the larval spinal cord. The cells have several processes including a long one that projects toward the brain without fasciculating with other labeled processes. In addition, the cytoplasm of the catecholaminergic cells extends into the central canal, showing that they are a population of cerebrospinal fluid‐contacting neurons. The spatial domain of catecholaminergic neurons starts abruptly at the boundary between the hindbrain and spinal cord and continues to the tip of the tail. The neurons occupy two longitudinal columns within the sheet of floor plate cells, which includes cells that do not exhibit the catecholaminergic phenotype. Unlabeled cells are intercalated between catecholaminergic cells in each column, giving the labeled cells the appearance of being spaced along the length of the spinal cord. This general arrangement is evident at the time of hatching. Spatial analysis showed that the position of cells along a column is not random. The nonrandom behavior is due to cells being excluded from the area immediately surrounding other catecholaminergic cells. Further analysis showed that the cellular pattern lacks segmental or other periodic repeats. Ultimately, the location of a cell within a column depends upon the position of its closest catecholaminergic neighbor. © 1993 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.