Premium
Uniformity of monkey striate cortex: A parallel relationship between field size, scatter, and magnification factor
Author(s) -
Hubel David H.,
Wiesel Torsten N.
Publication year - 1974
Publication title -
journal of comparative neurology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.855
H-Index - 209
eISSN - 1096-9861
pISSN - 0021-9967
DOI - 10.1002/cne.901580305
Subject(s) - orientation column , striate cortex , ocular dominance column , receptive field , visual cortex , magnification , visual field , macaque , eccentricity (behavior) , extrastriate cortex , cortex (anatomy) , orientation (vector space) , foveal , ocular dominance , optics , biology , physics , neuroscience , geometry , mathematics , psychology , retinal , social psychology , biochemistry
This paper is concerned with the relationship between orientation columns, ocular‐dominance columns, the topographic mapping of visual fields onto cortex, and receptive‐field size and scatter. Although the orientation columns are an order of magnitude smaller than the ocular‐dominance columns, the horizontal distance corresponding to a complete cycle of orientation columns, representing a rotation through 180°, seems to be roughly the same size as a left‐plus‐right ocular dominance set, with a thickness of about 0.5–1 mm, independent of eccentricity at least out to 15°. We use the term hypercolumn to refer to a complete set of either type (180°, or left‐plus‐right eyes). In the macaque monkey several penetrations were made at various eccentricities in various parts of the striate cortex subserving the fovea, parafovea and midperiphery. As observed many times previously, in any vertical penetration there was an apparently random scatter in receptive‐field positions, which was of the same order of magnitude as the individual receptive fields in that part of the cortex; the field size and the scatter increased in parallel fashion with eccentricity. The movement through the visual field corresponding to a 1 mm horizontal movement along the cortex (the reciprocal of the magnification factor) also increased with eccentricity, in a manner that was strikingly parallel with the increase in receptive field size and scatter. In parts of the cortex representing retina, at least out to about 22° from the fovea, a movement along the cortical surface of about 1 mm was enough to displace the fields so that the new position they collectively occupied half overlapped the old. Such an overlap was thus produced by moving along the cortex a distance about equal to the thickness of a left‐plus‐right set of ocular‐dominance columns, or a complete 180° array of orientation columns. It therefore seems that, independent of eccentricity, a 2 mm × 2 mm block of cortex contains by a comfortable margin the machinery needed to analyze a region of visual field roughly equal to the local field size plus scatter. A movement of 2–3 mm corresponds to a new visual field region and to several new sets of hypercolumns. The cortex thus seems remarkably uniform physiologically, just as it is anatomically.