Premium
Retinal ganglion cells in the eastern newt Notophthalmus viridescens : Topography, morphology, and diversity
Author(s) -
Pushchin Igor I.,
Karetin Yuriy A.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of comparative neurology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.855
H-Index - 209
eISSN - 1096-9861
pISSN - 0021-9967
DOI - 10.1002/cne.22127
Subject(s) - biology , retinal , retina , retinal ganglion cell , anatomy , neuroscience , biochemistry
The topography and morphology of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in the eastern newt were studied. Cells were retrogradely labeled with tetramethylrhodamine‐conjugated dextran amines or horseradish peroxidase and examined in retinal wholemounts. Their total number was 18,025 ± 3,602 (mean ± SEM). The spatial density of RGCs varied from 2,100 cells/mm 2 in the retinal periphery to 4,500 cells/mm 2 in the dorsotemporal retina. No prominent retinal specializations were found. The spatial resolution estimated from the spatial density of RGCs varied from 1.4 cycles per degree in the periphery to 1.95 cycles per degree in the region of the peak RGC density. A sample of 68 cells was camera lucida drawn and subjected to quantitative analysis. A total of 21 parameters related to RGC morphology and stratification in the retina were estimated. Partitionings obtained by using different clustering algorithms combined with automatic variable weighting and dimensionality reduction techniques were compared, and an effective solution was found by using silhouette analysis. A total of seven clusters were identified and associated with potential cell types. Kruskal‐Wallis ANOVA‐on‐Ranks with post hoc Mann‐Whitney U tests showed significant pairwise between‐cluster differences in one or more of the clustering variables. The average silhouette values of the clusters were reasonably high, ranging from 0.52 to 0.79. Cells assigned to the same cluster displayed similar morphology and stratification in the retina. The advantages and limitations of the methodology adopted are discussed. The present classification is compared with known morphological and physiological RGC classifications in other salamanders. J. Comp. Neurol. 516:533–552, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.