Premium
Distribution of somatostatin‐like immunoreactivity in the brain of the caecilian Dermophis mexicanus (amphibia: Gymnophiona): Comparative aspects in amphibians
Author(s) -
López Jesús M.,
Moreno Nerea,
Morona Ruth,
Muñoz Margarita,
Domínguez Laura,
González Agustín
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
journal of comparative neurology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.855
H-Index - 209
eISSN - 1096-9861
pISSN - 0021-9967
DOI - 10.1002/cne.21244
Subject(s) - biology , cerebrum , tegmentum , amphibian , anatomy , median eminence , ependyma , hypothalamus , neuroscience , central nervous system , midbrain , ecology
The organization of the somatostatin‐like‐immunoreactive (SOM‐ir) structures in the brain of anuran and urodele amphibians has been well documented, and significant differences were noted between the two amphibian orders. However, comparable data are not available for the third order of amphibians, the gymnophionans (caecilians). In the present study, we analyzed the anatomical distribution of SOM‐ir cells and fibers in the brain of the gymnophionan Dermophis mexicanus . In addition, because of its known relationship with catecholamines in other vertebrates, double immunostaining for SOM and tyrosine hydroxylase was used to investigate this situation in the gymnophionan. Abundant SOM‐ir cell bodies and fibers were widely distributed throughout the brain. In the telencephalon, pallial and subpallial cells were labeled, being most numerous in the medial pallium and amygdaloid region. Most of the SOM‐ir neurons were found in the preoptic area and hypothalamus and showed a clear projection to the median eminence. Less conspicuously, SOM‐ir structures were found in the thalamus, tectum, tegmentum, and reticular formation. Both SOM‐ir cells and fibers were demonstrated in the spinal cord. The double‐immunohistofluoresce technique revealed that catecholaminergic neurons and SOM‐ir cells are largely intermingled in many brain regions but form totally separated populations. Many differences were found between the distribution of SOM‐ir structures in Dermophis and that in anurans or urodeles. Some features were shared only with anurans, such as the abundant pallial SOM‐ir cells, whereas others were common only to urodeles, such as the organization of the hypothalamohypophysial SOM‐ir system. In addition, some characteristics were found only in Dermophis , such as the localization of the SOM‐ir spinal cells and the lack of colocalization of catecholamines and SOM throughout the brain. Therefore, any conclusions concerning the SOM system in amphibians are incomplete without considering evidence for gymnophionans. J. Comp. Neurol. 501:413–430, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.