z-logo
Premium
Class I and class II ganglion cells of rabbit retina: Quantitative analysis of dendritic branching patterns
Author(s) -
Famiglietti Edward V.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of comparative neurology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.855
H-Index - 209
eISSN - 1096-9861
pISSN - 0021-9967
DOI - 10.1002/cne.20269
Subject(s) - biology , retina , rabbit (cipher) , ganglion , branching (polymer chemistry) , neuroscience , giant retinal ganglion cells , bistratified cell , class (philosophy) , microbiology and biotechnology , retinal ganglion cell , artificial intelligence , computer science , materials science , computer security , composite material
Class I and class II ganglion cells, distinguished from one another in a companion paper, were analyzed in regard to their dendritic branching patterns by determination of: 1) mean “branching density” (BD), 2) “radial branching frequency” (RBF), and 3) “branch length distributions” (BLDs; Famiglietti [ 1992a] J Comp Neurol 324:295–321). Branching density of class II cells exceeded that of class I cells by a factor of two, when compared at the same retinal location, but declined with increasing distance from the visual streak ( dvs ). A one‐bin difference in RBF between class I and class II cells was not statistically significant. BLDs are scatter‐plots of individual preterminal and terminal branch lengths versus the distances of their origins from the soma. The parameters m p and m t , the slopes of regression lines fitted to the preterminal and terminal BLDs, respectively, were determined; m p , but not m t , was relatively independent of dvs , and was used empirically to determine a boundary value, m p = +5.0, separating “radiate” from “tufted” dendritic branching. Similarity of class I (m p = +8.6 ± 4.6) and class II (m p = +1.4 ± 5.2) cells did not allow a statistically significant separation of the two classes, based upon branching pattern alone; however, m p together with m t easily separated class I cells (m t = −17.8 ± 10.0) and particularly “tufted” class II cells (m t = −16 ± 9.3) from “tufted” class III.1 ganglion cells (Famiglietti, 1992a), with their qualitatively different, more regular branching (m p = +2.1 ± 0.85; m t = +0.65 ±4.9). J. Comp. Neurol. 478:347–358, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom