z-logo
Premium
Clues to recognition of fumarate hydratase‐deficient renal cell carcinoma: Findings from cytologic and limited biopsy samples
Author(s) -
Shyu Irene,
Mirsadraei Leili,
Wang Xiaoyan,
Robila Valentina,
Mehra Rohit,
McHugh Jonathan B.,
Chen YingBei,
Udager Aaron M.,
Gill Anthony J.,
Cheng Liang,
Amin Mahul B.,
Lin Oscar,
Smith Steven Christopher
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
cancer cytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.29
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1934-6638
pISSN - 1934-662X
DOI - 10.1002/cncy.22071
Subject(s) - medicine , biopsy , renal cell carcinoma , pathology , cytology , carcinoma
Background Fumarate hydratase (FH)‐deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is rare and highly aggressive and is believed to arise mostly in the setting of hereditary leiomyomatosis‐RCC syndrome with a germline mutation of FH . Because of the aggressiveness of these tumors and a frequent lack of ascertainable family history, these tumors may first present as metastases and be sampled by cytology. The cytologic findings of FH‐deficient RCC have not previously been reported. Methods Cytologic and limited biopsy samples from patients with FH‐deficient RCC were reviewed retrospectively. Results In total, 24 cytologic and limited biopsy samples from 19 patients (6 women and 13 men; age range, 22‐69 years) who had FH‐deficient RCC and metastasis at presentation were evaluated. These included 21 cytology samples ranging from malignant effusions (n = 7) to metastases (n = 11), to samples of primary kidney tumors (n = 3). The samples exhibited cells, often in clusters and abortive papillae, with voluminous, finely vacuolated cytoplasm and large, pleomorphic nuclei with prominent, viral inclusion‐like nucleoli. A distinctive finding of peripheral cytoplasmic clearing frequently was apparent, and intranuclear cytoplasmic pseudoinclusions were less frequent. Of 7 cell block and biopsy samples, several of which represented sampling from the same patient, all demonstrated tissue fragments that had discernable morphologic patterns associated with FH‐deficient RCC, including tubulocystic and intracystic papillary growth. Conclusions Features characteristic and suggestive of FH‐deficient RCC may be identified in cytologic and small biopsy samples. Although the current samples were identified retrospectively in well characterized cases of FH‐deficient RCC, the authors argue that, with appropriate clinical correlation, these features are sufficiently distinctive to trigger recognition and confirmatory workup.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here