Premium
The role of deeper levels and ancillary studies (p16 Ink4a and ProExC) in reducing the discordance rate of Papanicolaou findings of high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and follow‐up cervical biopsies
Author(s) -
David Odile,
Cabay Robert J.,
Pasha Seema,
Dietrich Ruth,
Leach Lu,
Guo Meihua,
Mehrotra Swati
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
cancer cytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.29
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1934-6638
pISSN - 1934-662X
DOI - 10.1002/cncy.20020
Subject(s) - medicine , papanicolaou stain , squamous intraepithelial lesion , biopsy , pathology , cytopathology , h&e stain , cervical cancer , sampling (signal processing) , cytology , cervical intraepithelial neoplasia , intraepithelial neoplasia , colposcopy , histology , staining , radiology , cancer , prostate cancer , filter (signal processing) , computer science , computer vision
Abstract BACKGROUND: Discordant results of cervical biopsy histology after a cytologic diagnosis of high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) are often attributed to sampling variation. The purpose of the current study was to determine whether deeper levels and ancillary staining (p16 Ink4a and ProExC) reduce the discordant rate. METHODS: A total of 246 cases of HSIL were retrieved from the computerized database from 2005 and 2006. Of these cases, 151 were followed by cervical biopsy. There was cytologic‐histologic correlation in 87 cases, as defined by the presence of high‐grade (2 or 3) cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (HGCIN). For each discordant biopsy (n = 64), 2 deeper levels for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) were taken at 30‐μ and 90‐μ depths, and 4 sections for p16 Ink4a and ProExC staining were taken at a 60‐μ depth. All cytologic and histologic material from these 64 cases was reviewed by 3 cytopathologists. In 2 cases, the original HSIL diagnoses were downgraded and the cases censored from the study. RESULTS: Fifty‐seven of the 62 discordant cases had sufficient tissue for deeper levels and ancillary staining. Two of 57 cases were reclassified to HGCIN. In both of these cases, reclassification was suggested by results of immunostains; however, the H&E sections were necessary for definitive interpretation of the immunostain results. CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, deeper levels and ancillary staining with p16 Ink4a and ProExC did not significantly reduce the discordance rate. Although there are many known causes of sampling variation, including factors related to colposcopic technique, regression of infection, and insufficient histologic sectioning, sampling variation remains a valid justification of noncorrelation in women with HSIL followed up by cervical biopsy alone. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.