Premium
Risk of invasive prostate cancer and prostate cancer death in relatives of patients with prostatic borderline or in situ neoplasia: A nationwide cohort study
Author(s) -
Xu Xing,
Fallah Mahdi,
Tian Yu,
Mukama Trasias,
Sundquist Kristina,
Sundquist Jan,
Brenner Hermann,
Kharazmi Elham
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.33096
Subject(s) - medicine , family history , prostate cancer , confidence interval , relative risk , cohort , incidence (geometry) , cancer , cumulative incidence , gynecology , prostate , cohort study , oncology , demography , physics , optics , sociology
Background The question of whether having a family history of prostatic borderline or in situ neoplasia (PBISN) is associated with an increased risk of invasive prostate cancer (PCa) or death from PCa remains unanswered. The objective of the current study was to provide an evidence‐based risk estimation for the relatives of patients with PBISN. Methods Nationwide Swedish family cancer data sets were used for the current study, including data regarding all residents of Sweden who were born after 1931 and their parents. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs), standardized mortality ratios (SMRs), and lifetime cumulative risks of PCa were calculated for men with different constellations of family history. Family history was defined as a dynamic (time‐dependent) variable considering changes during follow‐up (1958‐2015). Results Of the 6,343,727 men in the current study, a total of 238,961 developed invasive PCa and 5756 were diagnosed with PBISN during the follow‐up. Men with 1 first‐degree relative who was diagnosed with PBISN had a 70% increased risk of invasive PCa (SIR, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.5‐1.9) and PCa death (SMR, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.3‐2.2) compared with men with no family history of PBISN or invasive PCa. These were rather close to estimates in men with 1 first‐degree relative diagnosed with invasive PCa (SIR, 2.1 and SMR, 1.8). A higher risk of PCa in family members was found among patients with a family history of PBISN and/or PCa diagnosed before age 60 years. The results in terms of cumulative risk resembled this trend. Conclusions A family history of PBISN appears to be as important as a family history of invasive PCa with regard to an increased risk of invasive PCa or PCa mortality. Such a history should not be overlooked in PCa screening recommendations or in future research regarding familial PCa.