Premium
Life satisfaction in young adults with cancer and the role of sociodemographic, medical, and psychosocial factors: Results of a longitudinal study
Author(s) -
Leuteritz Katja,
Friedrich Michael,
Sender Annekathrin,
Nowe Erik,
StoebelRichter Yve,
Geue Kristina
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.31659
Subject(s) - psychosocial , medicine , human sexuality , demography , longitudinal study , life satisfaction , young adult , disease , gerontology , clinical psychology , psychology , psychiatry , social psychology , gender studies , pathology , sociology
BACKGROUND Being diagnosed with and treated for cancer often has a strong impact on the life satisfaction (LS) of adolescents and young adults (AYAs). The current study investigated LS in AYA patients with cancer and determined associated factors. METHODS Young patients (those aged 18‐39 years at the time of diagnosis) with all malignant cancer sites and with a diagnosis made within the last 4 years were assessed. LS was measured at 2 measuring time points using the Questions on Life Satisfaction (FLZ‐M). Differences in the FLZ‐M and the 10 subdomains (friends/acquaintances, leisure activities/hobbies, health, income/financial security, work/profession, housing situation, family life, children/family planning, partnership, and sexuality) between the 2 time points were calculated. Multiple regression analyses were conducted to determine factors associated with LS. RESULTS A total of 514 patients (386 of whom were women) with a mean age at diagnosis of 29.6 years participated at both measurements. LS increased significantly in 5 domains with a small effect (Hedges g, 0.17) noted over time. The subdomains with the lowest LS were financial and professional situation, family planning, and sexuality. Significant associations with LS were found at baseline for sociodemographic, medical, and psychosocial variables (explained variance [R 2 ] baseline = 0.41). At follow‐up, psychosocial factors (positive social support, not having detrimental interactions, and lower perceived adjustment to the disease) remained most important for higher LS controlled for LS at baseline. Neither sociodemographic (except partnership) nor medical factors played a role (R 2 follow‐up = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS Of all the variables examined, social support was found to be the most decisive factor associated with LS at both time points. With regard to LS, social support and adjustment to illness should be given more consideration in the medical care of AYA patients with cancer.