Premium
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for “biopsy‐only” glioblastoma multiforme
Author(s) -
Kole Adam J.,
Park Henry S.,
Yeboa Debra N.,
Rutter Charles E.,
Corso Christopher D.,
Aneja Sanjay,
LesterColl Nataniel H.,
Mancini Brandon R.,
Knisely Jonathan P.,
Yu James B.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.30063
Subject(s) - medicine , temozolomide , hazard ratio , chemoradiotherapy , proportional hazards model , biopsy , confidence interval , radiation therapy , surgery , oncology
BACKGROUND Combined temozolomide and radiotherapy (RT) is the standard postoperative therapy for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). However, the clearest benefit of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) observed in clinical trials has been among patients who undergo surgical resection. Whether the improved survival with CRT extends to patients who undergo “biopsy only” is less certain. The authors compared overall survival (OS) in a national cohort of patients with GBM who underwent biopsy and received either RT alone or CRT during the temozolomide era. METHODS The US National Cancer Data Base was used to identify patients with histologically confirmed, biopsy‐only GBM who received either RT alone or CRT from 2006 through 2011. Demographic and clinicopathologic predictors of treatment were analyzed using the chi‐square test, the t test, and multivariable logistic regression. OS was evaluated using the log‐rank test, multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression, and propensity score‐matched analysis. RESULTS In total, 1479 patients with biopsy‐only GBM were included, among whom 154 (10.4%) received RT alone and 1325 (89.6%) received CRT. The median age at diagnosis was 61 years. CRT was associated with a significant OS benefit compared with RT alone (median, 9.2 vs 5.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54‐0.76; P < .001). CRT was independently associated with improved OS compared with RT alone on multivariable analysis (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60‐0.85; P < .001). A significant OS benefit for CRT persisted in a propensity score‐matched analysis (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.56‐0.93; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS The current data suggest that CRT significantly improves OS in patients with GBM who undergo biopsy only compared with RT alone and should remain the standard of care for patients who can tolerate therapy. Cancer 2016;122:2364–2370 . © 2016 American Cancer Society .