Premium
Nonbleeding adenomas: Evidence of systematic false‐negative fecal immunochemical test results and their implications for screening effectiveness—A modeling study
Author(s) -
van der Meulen Miriam P.,
LansdorpVogelaar Iris,
van Heijningen ElseMariëtte B.,
Kuipers Ernst J.,
van Ballegooijen Marjolein
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.29952
Subject(s) - medicine , meta analysis , false positive rate , colorectal cancer screening , negativity effect , false negative reactions , bleed , statistics , colonoscopy , colorectal cancer , surgery , cancer , psychology , mathematics , social psychology
BACKGROUND If some adenomas do not bleed over several years, they will cause systematic false‐negative fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results. The long‐term effectiveness of FIT screening has been estimated without accounting for such systematic false‐negativity. There are now data with which to evaluate this issue. METHODS The authors developed one microsimulation model (MISCAN [MIcrosimulation SCreening ANalysis]‐Colon) without systematic false‐negative FIT results and one model that allowed a percentage of adenomas to be systematically missed in successive FIT screening rounds. Both variants were adjusted to reproduce the first‐round findings of the Dutch CORERO FIT screening trial. The authors then compared simulated detection rates in the second screening round with those observed, and adjusted the simulated percentage of systematically missed adenomas to those data. Finally, the authors calculated the impact of systematic false‐negative FIT results on the effectiveness of repeated FIT screening. RESULTS The model without systematic false‐negativity simulated higher detection rates in the second screening round than observed. These observed rates could be reproduced when assuming that FIT systematically missed 26% of advanced and 73% of nonadvanced adenomas. To reduce the false‐positive rate in the second round to the observed level, the authors also had to assume that 30% of false‐positive findings were systematically false‐positive. Systematic false‐negative FIT testing limits the long‐term reduction of biennial FIT screening in the incidence of colorectal cancer (35.6% vs 40.9%) and its mortality (55.2% vs 59.0%) in participants. CONCLUSIONS The results of the current study provide convincing evidence based on the combination of real‐life and modeling data that a percentage of adenomas are systematically missed by repeat FIT screening. This impairs the efficacy of FIT screening. Cancer 2016;122:1680‐8 . © 2016 American Cancer Society .