z-logo
Premium
Downstage migration after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: The reverse of the Will Rogers phenomenon?
Author(s) -
Fokas Emmanouil,
Liersch Torsten,
Fietkau Rainer,
Hohenberger Werner,
Hess Clemens,
Becker Heinz,
Sauer Rolf,
Wittekind Christian,
Rödel Claus
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.29260
Subject(s) - medicine , colorectal cancer , surrogate endpoint , chemoradiotherapy , fluorouracil , clinical endpoint , oncology , neoadjuvant therapy , stage (stratigraphy) , cancer , clinical trial , phases of clinical research , surgery , breast cancer , paleontology , biology
Downstaging after neoadjuvant treatment is increasingly used as a prognostic factor and surrogate endpoint in clinical trials. However, in recent trials of neoadjuvant 5‐fluorouracil–based chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer, downstaging did not translate into a benefit with regard to either disease‐free survival (DFS) or overall survival. By analyzing the 10‐year outcome data of the German CAO/ARO/AIO‐94 phase 3 trial, the authors demonstrated that significantly fewer patients had poor prognostic features (eg, ypT3‐4, ypN1‐2) after preoperative 5‐fluorouracil–based chemoradiotherapy. Nevertheless, these patients with International Union for Cancer Control stage II disease were found to be at a higher risk of developing distant metastases and had poorer DFS compared with patients with corresponding TNM tumor (sub)groups in the postoperative treatment arm, whereas patients with International Union for Cancer Control stage III disease demonstrated a nonsignificant trend toward a worse outcome after preoperative treatment. Overall, DFS remained identical in both treatment arms. Thus, “downstage migration” after neoadjuvant treatment resembles the reverse of the Will Rogers phenomenon and therefore may not be a reliable endpoint for long‐term outcomes. Cancer 2015;121:1724–1727. © 2015 American Cancer Society .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here