Premium
Adherence and retention in clinical trials: A community‐based approach
Author(s) -
Fouad Mo.,
Johnson Rhoda E.,
Nagy M. Christine,
Person Sharina D.,
Partridge Edward E.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.28572
Subject(s) - medicine , clinical trial , population , randomized controlled trial , intervention (counseling) , family medicine , community health , triage , physical therapy , gerontology , public health , nursing , psychiatry , environmental health
BACKGROUND The Community Health Advisor (CHA) model has been widely used to recruit rural and low‐income, mostly African American women into clinical and behavioral research studies. However, little is known about its effectiveness in promoting retention and adherence of such women in clinical trials. METHODS The Community‐Based Retention Intervention Study evaluated the effectiveness of a community‐based intervention strategy using the CHA model and the empowerment theory to improve the retention and adherence of minority and low‐income women in clinical trials. The research strategy included the training and use of the volunteer CHAs as research partners. The target population included women participating in the University of Alabama at Birmingham clinical site of the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance–Low‐Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (ASCUS‐LSIL) Triage Study (ALTS), a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Two communities in Jefferson County, Alabama, that were matched according to population demographics were identified and randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. Thirty community volunteers were recruited to be CHAs and to implement the intervention with the ALTS trial participants. In total, 632 ALTS participants agreed to participate in the project, including 359 in the intervention group, which received CHA care, and 273 in the control group, which received standard care. RESULTS Adherence rates for scheduled clinic visits were significantly higher in the intervention group (80%) compared with the control group (65%; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that volunteer CHAs can be trained to serve as research partners and can be effective in improving the retention and adherence of minority and low‐income women in clinical trials. Cancer 2014;120(7 suppl):1106–12 . © 2014 American Cancer Society .