Premium
Metastatic non–clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapy agents: Characterization of survival outcome and application of the International mRCC Database Consortium criteria
Author(s) -
Kroeger Nils,
Xie Wanling,
Lee JaeLyn,
Bjarnason Georg A.,
Knox Jennifer J.,
MacKenzie Mary J.,
Wood Lori,
Srinivas Sandy,
Vaishamayan Ulka N.,
Rha SunYoung,
Pal Sumanta K.,
Yuasa Takeshi,
Donskov Frede,
Agarwal Neeraj,
Kollmannsberger Christian K.,
Tan MinHan,
North Scott A.,
Rini Brian I.,
Choueiri Toni K.,
Heng Daniel Y.C.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.28151
Subject(s) - medicine , hazard ratio , renal cell carcinoma , clear cell renal cell carcinoma , targeted therapy , cohort , oncology , gastroenterology , cancer , urology , database , confidence interval , computer science
BACKGROUND This study aimed to apply the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic model in metastatic non–clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC). In addition, the survival outcome of metastatic nccRCC patients was characterized. METHODS Data on 2215 patients (1963 with clear‐cell RCC [ccRCC] and 252 with nccRCC) treated with first‐line VEGF‐ and mTOR‐targeted therapies were collected from the IMDC. Time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were compared in groups with favorable, intermediate, and poor prognoses according to IMDC prognostic criteria RESULTS The median OS of the entire cohort was 20.9 months. nccRCC patients were younger ( P < .0001) and more often presented with low hemoglobin ( P = .014) and elevated neutrophils ( P = .0001), but otherwise had clinicopathological features similar to those of ccRCC patients. OS (12.8 vs 22.3 months; P < .0001) and TTF (4.2 vs 7.8 months; P < .0001) were worse in nccRCC patients compared with ccRCC patients. The hazard ratio for death and TTF when adjusted for the prognostic factors was 1.41 (95% CI, 1.19‐1.67; P < .0001) and 1.54 (95% CI, 1.33‐1.79; P < .0001), respectively. The IMDC prognostic model reliably discriminated 3 risk groups to predict OS and TTF in nccRCC; the median OS of the favorable, intermediate, and poor prognosis groups was 31.4, 16.1, and 5.1 months, respectively ( P < .0001), and the median TTF was 9.6, 4.9, and 2.1 months, respectively ( P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS Although targeted agents have significantly improved the outcome of patients with nccRCC, for the majority survival is still inferior compared with patients with ccRCC. The IMDC prognostic model reliably predicts OS and TTF in nccRCC and ccRCC patients. Cancer 2013;119:2999—3006 . © 2013 American Cancer Society .