z-logo
Premium
AMIGAS: A multicity, multicomponent cervical cancer prevention trial among Mexican American women
Author(s) -
Byrd Theresa L.,
Wilson Katherine M.,
Smith Judith Lee,
Coronado Gloria,
Ver Sally W.,
FernandezEsquer Maria Eugenia,
Thompson Beti,
Ortiz Melchor,
Lairson David,
Fernandez Maria E.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.27926
Subject(s) - medicine , pap test , papanicolaou stain , family medicine , cervical cancer , incidence (geometry) , ethnic group , health care , randomized controlled trial , intervention (counseling) , demography , gynecology , cervical cancer screening , gerontology , cancer , nursing , surgery , physics , sociology , anthropology , optics , economics , economic growth
BACKGROUND: Considerable efforts have been undertaken in the United States to reduce cervical cancer incidence and mortality by increasing screening; however, disparities in screening rates continue to exist among certain racial and ethnic minority groups. The objective of the current study was to determine the effectiveness of a lay health worker‐delivered intervention—AMIGAS ( Ayudando a las Mujeres con Informacion, Guia, y Amor para su Salud [helping women with information, guidance, and love for their health])—to increase Papanicolaou (Pap) test screening among 3 populations of women of Mexican origin. METHODS: Six hundred thirteen women of Mexican origin in 3 treatment sites were randomized among 4 study arms: the full AMIGAS program with a video and a flip chart (n = 151), the AMIGAS program without the video (n = 154), the AMIGAS program without the flip chart (n = 155), and a usual care control group (n = 153). Six months after enrollment, women were surveyed and reported whether or not they had been screened. RESULTS: Women in any of the intervention arms were statistically significantly more likely to report being screened than those in the usual care group in both an intent‐to‐treat analysis and a per‐protocol analysis. In the intent‐to‐treat analysis, 25% of women in the control group and 52% in the full AMIGAS program group reported having had Pap tests ( P < .001); in the per‐protocol analysis, the percentages were 29% and 62%, respectively ( P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: AMIGAS was effective in increasing Pap test screening among women of Mexican descent when used in a 1‐to‐1 setting. Future research should compare the 1‐on‐1 intervention with the group‐based intervention. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom