z-logo
Premium
Phase 2 study of everolimus monotherapy in patients with nonfunctioning neuroendocrine tumors or pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas
Author(s) -
Oh DoYoun,
Kim TaeWon,
Park Young Suk,
Shin Sang Joon,
Shin Seong Hoon,
Song EunKee,
Lee Hyo Jin,
Lee Kewnwook,
Bang YungJue
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.27675
Subject(s) - medicine , everolimus , clinical endpoint , progressive disease , common terminology criteria for adverse events , neuroendocrine tumors , response evaluation criteria in solid tumors , confidence interval , progression free survival , adverse effect , surgery , oncology , disease , overall survival , clinical trial
BACKGROUND: The current study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of everolimus in the treatment of patients with nonfunctioning neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) or pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed nonfunctioning NETs or pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas and with documented disease progression before study enrollment were eligible for the current study. Everolimus was administered daily at a dose of 10 mg for 4 weeks. Response was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.0) every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the 4‐month progression‐free survival rate (PFSR). The hypothesis of the current study was that the 4‐month PFSR would increase from 50% to 65%. Safety was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0). RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were enrolled. Of these, 27 patients had nonfunctioning NETs, 5 had pheochromocytomas, and 2 had paragangliomas. The 4‐month PFSR was 78%. Partial response (PR) was observed in 3 patients. Twenty‐eight patients had stable disease (SD) and 2 patients developed progressive disease (PD). The response rate (RR) and overall disease control rate (DCR) were 9.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0%‐18.6%) and 93.9% (95% CI, 85.8%‐100%), respectively. The PFS was 15.3 months (95% CI, 4.6 months‐26.0 months). Of the patients with nonfunctioning NETs, 3 achieved a PR and 23 had SD (RR, 11.1%; DCR, 100%); the PFS was 17.1 months (95% CI, 11.1 months‐23.0 months) and the 4‐month PFSR was 90.0%. Twenty‐one patients (80.8%) demonstrated tumor shrinkage. In 7 patients with pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas, 5 achieved SD, and 2 developed PD. The PFS was 3.8 months (95% CI, 0.5 months‐7.0 months) and the 4‐month PFSR was 42.9%. Four patients demonstrated tumor shrinkage. The major grade 3/4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (14.7%), hyperglycemia (5.9%), stomatitis (5.9%), and anemia (5.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus was associated with high therapeutic efficacy and tolerability in patients with nonfunctioning NETs, and demonstrated modest efficacy in patients with pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom