Premium
Phase 2 study of everolimus monotherapy in patients with nonfunctioning neuroendocrine tumors or pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas
Author(s) -
Oh DoYoun,
Kim TaeWon,
Park Young Suk,
Shin Sang Joon,
Shin Seong Hoon,
Song EunKee,
Lee Hyo Jin,
Lee Kewnwook,
Bang YungJue
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.27675
Subject(s) - medicine , everolimus , clinical endpoint , progressive disease , common terminology criteria for adverse events , neuroendocrine tumors , response evaluation criteria in solid tumors , confidence interval , progression free survival , adverse effect , surgery , oncology , disease , overall survival , clinical trial
BACKGROUND: The current study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of everolimus in the treatment of patients with nonfunctioning neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) or pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas. METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed nonfunctioning NETs or pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas and with documented disease progression before study enrollment were eligible for the current study. Everolimus was administered daily at a dose of 10 mg for 4 weeks. Response was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.0) every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the 4‐month progression‐free survival rate (PFSR). The hypothesis of the current study was that the 4‐month PFSR would increase from 50% to 65%. Safety was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 3.0). RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were enrolled. Of these, 27 patients had nonfunctioning NETs, 5 had pheochromocytomas, and 2 had paragangliomas. The 4‐month PFSR was 78%. Partial response (PR) was observed in 3 patients. Twenty‐eight patients had stable disease (SD) and 2 patients developed progressive disease (PD). The response rate (RR) and overall disease control rate (DCR) were 9.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0%‐18.6%) and 93.9% (95% CI, 85.8%‐100%), respectively. The PFS was 15.3 months (95% CI, 4.6 months‐26.0 months). Of the patients with nonfunctioning NETs, 3 achieved a PR and 23 had SD (RR, 11.1%; DCR, 100%); the PFS was 17.1 months (95% CI, 11.1 months‐23.0 months) and the 4‐month PFSR was 90.0%. Twenty‐one patients (80.8%) demonstrated tumor shrinkage. In 7 patients with pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas, 5 achieved SD, and 2 developed PD. The PFS was 3.8 months (95% CI, 0.5 months‐7.0 months) and the 4‐month PFSR was 42.9%. Four patients demonstrated tumor shrinkage. The major grade 3/4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (14.7%), hyperglycemia (5.9%), stomatitis (5.9%), and anemia (5.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus was associated with high therapeutic efficacy and tolerability in patients with nonfunctioning NETs, and demonstrated modest efficacy in patients with pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.