z-logo
Premium
The use of single‐agent sorafenib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients with underlying Child‐Pugh B liver cirrhosis
Author(s) -
Chiu Joanne,
Tang Yuen Fong,
Yao TzyJyun,
Wong Ashley,
Wong Hilda,
Leung Roland,
Chan Pierre,
Cheung Tan To,
Chan Albert C.,
Pang Roberta,
Fan SheungTat,
Poon Ronnie,
Yau Thomas
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.27543
Subject(s) - medicine , hepatocellular carcinoma , sorafenib , cirrhosis , gastroenterology , oncology
Abstract BACKGROUND: This study explored the efficacy, tolerability, and survival benefits of using sorafenib in patients with Child‐Pugh class B (CPB) cirrhosis. METHODS: Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who were treated with sorafenib at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China, were analyzed retrospectively. Treatment outcomes were analyzed according to their respective Child‐Pugh status. Patients with CPB disease were further divided into CPB7 (those with a score of 7) and CPB8‐9 (a score of 8 or 9) subgroups. RESULTS: The baseline demographic parameters were comparable between 108 patients with Child‐Pugh class A (CPA) disease and 64 CPB patients. Both clinical benefit rate (21.3% vs 32.4% vs 14.8%; P = .23) and progression‐free survival (median: 3.2 months vs 3.2 months vs 2.3 months; P = .26) were similar among CPA, CPB7, and CPB8‐9 groups, respectively. The overall survival was different among these groups ( P = .002) and showed a trend toward worse outcome in CPB patients: the median was 6.1, 5.4, and 2.7 months among CPA, CPB7, and CPB8‐9 patients, respectively. The commonest grade 3/4 adverse events were hand‐foot syndrome (13.5%), diarrhea (9.9%), and rash (7.0%). Grade 3/4 leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in 2.9%, 5.3%, and 8.8% of the patients, respectively. Overall, the 3 groups of patients experienced similar incidence of most of these adverse events. Nonetheless, CPB patients experienced more anemia ( P = .01), gastrointestinal bleeding ( P = .02), and hepatic encephalopathy ( P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: CPA and CPB patients tolerated sorafenib similarly and derived similar clinical and progression‐free survival benefit. Among CPB patients, most benefits were observed in patients with a score of 7. Nevertheless, CPB patients were more susceptible to developing cirrhotic complications, and thus more vigilant surveillance is needed. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here