Premium
Survival disparities by Medicaid status
Author(s) -
Koroukian Siran M.,
Bakaki Paul M.,
Raghavan Derek
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.27380
Subject(s) - medicaid , medicine , hazard ratio , proportional hazards model , incidence (geometry) , cancer , population , logistic regression , cancer registry , lung cancer , demography , confidence interval , survival analysis , environmental health , health care , physics , sociology , optics , economics , economic growth
BACKGROUND: A study was undertaken to compare survival and 5‐year mortality by Medicaid status in adults diagnosed with 8 select cancers. METHODS: Linking records from the Ohio Cancer Incidence Surveillance System (OCISS) with Ohio Medicaid enrollment data, the authors identified Medicaid and non‐Medicaid patients aged 15 to 54 years and diagnosed with the following incident cancers in the years 1996‐2002: cancer of the testis; Hodgkin and non‐Hodgkin lymphoma; early stage melanoma, colon, lung, and bladder cancer; and pediatric malignancies (n = 12,703). Medicaid beneficiaries were placed in the pre‐diagnosis group if they were enrolled in Medicaid at least 3 months before cancer diagnosis, and in the peri/post‐diagnosis group if they enrolled in Medicaid upon or after being diagnosed with cancer. The authors also linked the OCISS with death certificates and data from the US Census. By using Cox and logistic regression analysis, they examined the association between Medicaid status and survival and 5‐year mortality, respectively, after adjusting for patient covariates. RESULTS: Nearly 11% of the study population were Medicaid beneficiaries. Of those, 45% were classified in the peri/post‐diagnosis group. Consistent with higher mortality, findings from the Cox regression model indicated that compared with non‐Medicaid, patients in the Medicaid pre‐diagnosis and peri/post‐diagnosis groups experienced unfavorable survival outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27‐1.82 and AHR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.70‐2.38, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid status was associated with unfavorable survival, even after adjusting for confounders. The findings reflect the vulnerability of Medicaid beneficiaries and possible inadequacies in the process of care. Cancer 2012. © 2011 American Cancer Society.