Premium
Impact of low estrogen/progesterone receptor expression on survival outcomes in breast cancers previously classified as triple negative breast cancers
Author(s) -
Raghav Kanwal P. S.,
HernandezAya Leonel F.,
Lei Xiudong,
ChavezMacGregor Marianan,
MericBernstam Funda,
Buchholz Thomas A.,
Sahin Aysegul,
Do KimAnh,
Hortobagyi Gabriel N.,
GonzalezAngulo Ana M.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.26431
Subject(s) - medicine , hazard ratio , progesterone receptor , estrogen receptor , confidence interval , proportional hazards model , estrogen , oncology , breast cancer , gynecology , gastroenterology , cancer
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of low estrogen/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) expression and effect of endocrine therapy on survival outcomes in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)‐negative tumors with ER/PR <10%, previously labeled as triple negative. METHODS: In a retrospective review, 1257 patients were categorized according their ER/PR percentages into 3 groups, ER/PR <1% (group A), ER/PR 1% to 5% (group B), and ER/PR 6% to 10% (group C). Kaplan‐Meier product limit method was used to estimate survival outcomes. Cox proportional hazards models was used to adjust for patient and tumor characteristics. RESULTS Groups A, B, and C had 897 (71.4%), 241 (19.2%), and 119 (9.4%) patients, respectively. After a median follow‐up of 40 months there was no significant difference in 3‐year recurrence‐free survival (RFS): 64%, 67%, and 77% ( P = .34) or overall survival (OS): 79%, 81%, and 88% ( P = .33) for groups A, B, and C, respectively. ER/PR expression was not an independent predictor for RFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86‐1.39; P = .46 for group B, and HR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.66‐1.38; P = .81 for group C, compared with group A), or OS (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.84‐1.46; P = .46 for group B, and HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.63‐1.42; P = .78 for group C, compared with group A). Endocrine therapy had no impact on survival outcomes (RFS: P = .10; OS: P = .45) among groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, a low ER/PR level (1%‐5%) does not appear to have any significant impact on survival outcomes. There was a tendency for survival advantages in the ER/PR 6% to 10% is seen. Benefit of endocrine therapy in these patients is unclear. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom