Premium
Differences in survival among women with stage III inflammatory and noninflammatory locally advanced breast cancer appear early
Author(s) -
Dawood Shaheenah,
Ueno Naoto T.,
Valero Vicente,
Woodward Wendy A.,
Buchholz Thomas A.,
Hortobagyi Gabriel N.,
GonzalezAngulo Ana Maria,
Cristofanilli Massimo
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.25682
Subject(s) - medicine , breast cancer , inflammatory breast cancer , oncology , confidence interval , stage (stratigraphy) , cancer , hazard ratio , cancer registry , cohort , population , gynecology , epidemiology , proportional hazards model , survival analysis , paleontology , biology , environmental health
BACKGROUND: Significant improvements in the survival of women with breast cancer have been observed and are attributed to a multidisciplinary approach and the introduction of polychemotherapy and endocrine regimens. The objective of this population‐based study was to determine whether women with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) who received treatment in a modern era had a poorer survival compared those with non‐IBC locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program registry was searched to identify women with stage IIIB/C breast cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2007 who had undergone surgery and radiotherapy. Patients were categorized as either having IBC or non‐IBC LABC according the sixth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) criteria. Breast cancer‐specific survival (BCS) was estimated using the Kaplan‐Meier product limit method and compared across groups using the log‐rank statistic. Cox models were then fitted to compare the association between breast cancer type and BCS after adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 828 (19.2%) women and 3476 (80.8%) women had stage IIIB/C IBC and non‐IBC LABC, respectively. The median follow‐up was 19 months. The 2‐year BCS rate was 90% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 88%‐91%) for the entire cohort and 84% (95%CI, 80%‐87%) and 91% (95%CI, 90%‐91%) among women with IBC and non‐IBC LABC, respectively. In the multivariable model, patients with IBC were found to have a 43% increased risk of death from breast cancer compared with patients with non‐IBC LABC (hazard ratio, 1.43; 95%CI, 1.10‐1.86 [ P = .008]). CONCLUSIONS: In the era of multidisciplinary management and anthracycline‐based and taxane‐based polychemotherapy regimens, women with IBC continue to have worse survival outcomes compared with those with non‐IBC LABC. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.