z-logo
Premium
Population‐based analysis of occult primary breast cancer with axillary lymph node metastasis
Author(s) -
Walker Gary V.,
Smith Grace L.,
Perkins George H.,
Oh Julia L.,
Woodward Wendy,
Yu TseKuan,
Hunt Kelly K.,
Hoffman Karen,
Strom Eric A.,
Buchholz Thomas A.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.25197
Subject(s) - medicine , breast cancer , axillary lymph node dissection , mastectomy , population , hazard ratio , radiation therapy , oncology , surgery , confidence interval , cancer , sentinel lymph node , environmental health
BACKGROUND: Single‐institution data suggest that treatment with radiation and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) may be an appropriate alternative to mastectomy for T0N+ breast cancer. Population‐based multi‐institutional data supporting this approach are lacking. METHODS: The cause‐specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) of women with T0N+M0 ductal, lobular, or mixed breast cancer in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 1983 to 2006 were analyzed. Groups were defined as: 1) no ALND, mastectomy, or RT (observation); 2) ALND only; 3) mastectomy plus ALND with or without postmastectomy radiation (Mast); and 4) breast‐conserving therapy (BCT) with ALND and radiation (BCT). RESULTS: In total, 750 of 770,030 patients with breast cancer had T0N+M0 disease (incidence, 0.10%), and 596 of those patients underwent ALND (79.5%). Patients who underwent Mast or BCT (n = 470) had a 10‐year OS rate of 64.9% compared with 58.5% for patients who underwent ALND only (n = 126; P = .02) and 47.5% for patients who underwent observation only (n = 94; P = .04). The 10‐year CSS rate was 75.7% for patients who underwent BCT versus 73.9% for patients who underwent Mast ( P = .55). In multivariate analysis of CSS for patients who underwent Mast or BCT, the following factors were correlated with an unfavorable outcome: positive estrogen receptor status (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24‐0.96; P = .04), ≥10 positive lymph nodes (HR, 5.7; 95%CI, 2.4‐13.4; P ≤ .01), and <10 resected lymph nodes (HR, 42.9; 95%CI, 1.2‐7.1; P = .02). Mast did not improve CSS compared with BCT (HR, 1.09; 95%CI, 0.57‐2.1; P = .79). CONCLUSIONS: Definitive locoregional treatment with either Mast or BCT improved the outcome of patients with T0N+breast cancer, and no difference in survival was observed between the treatments. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom