Premium
A phase 2 study of platinum and gemcitabine in patients with advanced salivary gland cancer
Author(s) -
Laurie Scott A.,
Siu Lillian L.,
Winquist Eric,
Maksymiuk Andrew,
Harnett Erica L.,
Walsh Wendy,
Tu Dongsheng,
Parulekar Wendy R.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.24745
Subject(s) - gemcitabine , medicine , carboplatin , regimen , cisplatin , response evaluation criteria in solid tumors , salivary gland cancer , oncology , chemotherapy , cancer , phases of clinical research , radiation therapy , clinical endpoint , surgery , clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Salivary gland cancers are rare, histologically diverse, and varied in their biologic behavior and responsiveness to systemic therapy. To the authors' knowledge, there currently is no standard chemotherapy for these tumors, but cisplatin‐based regimens are often used. This phase 2 trial evaluated the combination of gemcitabine with cisplatin (carboplatin in those with protocol‐defined contraindications to cisplatin). METHODS: Fit, consenting adult patients had advanced, metastatic, or locoregionally recurrent salivary gland cancer (any histologic subtype) that was not suitable for radiation or surgery. Therapy was comprised of gemcitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m 2 administered intravenously on Days 1 and 8, and cisplatin at a dose of 70 mg/m 2 on Day 2, of a 21‐day cycle. If carboplatin was substituted, it was administered on Day 1, targeted to an area under the concentration‐time curve of 5 mg/mL/s. Response was assessed every 2 cycles according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors. Patients received up to 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response. A 2‐stage design was used, with a response rate of 45% required to declare the regimen active. RESULTS: Thirty‐three eligible patients were enrolled, of whom 30 were response evaluable. Eight objective responses were observed (1 complete and 7 partial) for a response rate of 24% (95% confidence interval, 11‐42%), with responses observed in all histologic subtypes. Toxicity was within that expected for this combination. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen did not meet the predefined criteria to be declared active in advanced salivary gland cancers. Enrollment of patients with these rare cancers into well‐designed clinical trials remains an urgent priority. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.