Premium
Phase 2 trial results with the novel neurokinin‐1 receptor antagonist casopitant in combination with ondansetron and dexamethasone for the prevention of chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting in cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy
Author(s) -
Arpornwirat Wichit,
Albert Istvan,
Hansen Vincent L.,
Levin Jeremey,
Bandekar Rajesh R.,
Grunberg Steven M.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.24630
Subject(s) - ondansetron , medicine , retching , nausea , vomiting , chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting , dexamethasone , antiemetic , anesthesia , aprepitant , placebo , chemotherapy , gastroenterology , alternative medicine , pathology
BACKGROUND: This randomized, double‐blind, dose‐ranging, placebo‐controlled, phase 2 trial evaluated the neurokinin‐1 receptor antagonist casopitant mesylate in combination with ondansetron/dexamethasone (ond/dex) for the prevention of chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) related to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). METHODS: Chemotherapy‐naive patients who were receiving MEC (N = 723) were randomized to receive either oral placebo or casopitant at doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, or 150 mg daily (on Days 1‐3) plus ondansetron (on Days 1‐3) and dexamethasone (Day 1). Two exploratory arms evaluated single‐dose casopitant (150 mg) plus ond/dex and a 3‐day casopitant regimen with once‐daily ondansetron and dexamethasone. Primary endpoints were rates of complete response (CR) (no vomiting, retching, rescue therapy, or premature discontinuation) and significant nausea (SN) (≥25 mm on a visual analog scale) over the first 120 hours after Cycle 1 of MEC. Secondary endpoints included acute and delayed CR and SN rates, rates of nausea, vomiting, and safety. RESULTS: All casopitant doses that were tested significantly increased the proportion of patients with CR: The CR rates were 80.8% with casopitant 50 mg, 78.5% with casopitant 100 mg, and 84.2% with casopitant 150 mg compared with 69.4% in the control group ( P = .0127); casopitant 150 mg was identified as the minimally effective dose. In exploratory analyses, single‐dose casopitant demonstrated a 79.2% CR rate, and once‐daily ondansetron plus casopitant produced an 83.5% CR rate. Vomiting rates in the first 5 days after MEC were reduced with casopitant‐containing regimens (from 23% to 10%‐16%). Rates of SN did not differ among treatment arms (range, 28%‐29%). Casopitant appeared to be well tolerated with no notable differences in overall adverse event frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Casopitant plus ond/dex was more effective than ond/dex alone for the prevention of CINV. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.