Premium
Molecular classification system identifies invasive breast carcinoma patients who are most likely and those who are least likely to achieve a complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Author(s) -
Goldstein Neal S.,
Decker David,
Severson Dawn,
Schell Scott,
Vicini Frank,
Margolis Jeffrey,
Dekhne Nayana S.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.22981
Subject(s) - medicine , breast cancer , chemotherapy , basal (medicine) , invasive lobular carcinoma , immunohistochemistry , neoadjuvant therapy , carcinoma , lobular carcinoma , pathology , cancer , oncology , mammary gland , breast carcinoma , invasive ductal carcinoma , ductal carcinoma , insulin
Abstract BACKGROUND. The molecular classification system categorizes invasive breast carcinomas according to their key driving biomarkers. In the current study, the authors evaluated whether response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was correlated with the molecular classification groups. METHODS. Using immunohistochemistry, the molecular classification group (luminal‐A, luminal‐B, HER‐2–variant, HER‐2–classic, and basal phenotype) was retrospectively determined in 68 breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant treatment. RESULTS. A total of 28 carcinoma patients (41.2%) achieved a compete pathologic response (CPR), including 2 of 15 patients classified as having luminal‐A (13.3%), 4 of 16 patients classified as having luminal‐B (25.0%), 10 of 12 patients classified as having HER‐2–classic (83.3%), none of the 4 patients classified as having HER‐2–variant, and 12 of 21 patients classified as having basal phenotype (57.1%) neoplasms. The CPR rate among patients with the HER‐2–classic and basal neoplasms was 67% (22 of 33 neoplasms), compared with 17.1% (6 of 35 neoplasms) in the non‐HER‐2–classic/basal combined group ( P < .001). Eleven carcinomas were initially diagnosed as invasive lobular carcinomas (pleomorphic and classic), 4 of which were luminal‐A, 4 of which were luminal‐B, 2 of which were HER‐2–classic, and 1 of which was basal. On review, only 3 of these 11 cases remained classified as classic lobular carcinoma, all of which were classified as luminal‐A, and none of these patients achieved a CPR. Four of the other 8 patients achieved a CPR. CONCLUSIONS. The molecular classification system is useful for identifying carcinoma patients who are most likely and those who are least likely to achieve a CPR. In the current study, all the morphologically classic lobular carcinomas were classified as luminal‐A neoplasms, which may explain the low rate of CPR reported. Cancer 2007. © 2007 American Cancer Society.