z-logo
Premium
Cisplatin and gemcitabine with either vinorelbine or paclitaxel in the treatment of carcinomas of unknown primary site
Author(s) -
Palmeri Sergio,
Lorusso Vito,
Palmeri Laura,
Vaglica Marina,
Porta Camillo,
Nortilli Rolando,
Ferraú Francesco,
Comella Giuseppe,
Massidda Bruno,
Danova Marco
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.22379
Subject(s) - vinorelbine , medicine , gemcitabine , regimen , cisplatin , chemotherapy , paclitaxel , confidence interval , oncology , carcinoma , gastroenterology , surgery
BACKGROUND. To date, the standard treatment for patients who have carcinoma of unknown primary site has not been established. METHODS. In this randomized Phase II study, 66 previously untreated patients (33 patients per arm) with carcinomas of unknown primary site received cisplatin (35 mg/m 2 ) and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m 2 ) with either paclitaxel (70 mg/m 2 ) or vinorelbine (25 mg/m 2 ), and all drugs were administered intravenously on Days 1 and 8 of a 21‐day cycle. Twenty‐nine patients (44%) presented with ≥2 involved sites. The pathologic diagnosis was mainly adenocarcinoma (48 patients; 72.7%) and squamous carcinoma (7 patients; 10.6%). RESULTS. In the first arm, 16 patients (48.5%) experienced an objective response, and 9 patients (27.2%) had disease stabilization. In the vinorelbine‐containing arm, 14 patients (42.3%) experienced an objective response, and 8 patients (24.2%) had disease stabilization. The median response duration and the median time to progression were similar in both treatment arms; the median overall survival was 9.6 months (95% confidence interval, 7.11–12.09 months) for patients who received the cisplatin/gemcitabine/paclitaxel regimen and 13.6 months (95% confidence interval, 6.61–20.59 months) for patients who received the vinorelbine combination. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were more frequent in the paclitaxel‐containing arm. CONCLUSIONS. Both combinations satisfied the 2‐step design, demonstrating antitumor activity without relevant differences in response rates or response duration; however, the vinorelbine‐containing regimen yielded superior results both in terms of overall survival (13.6 months vs 9.6 months) and in terms of treatment tolerability. Therefore, according to a pick the winner attitude, the combination of cisplatin/gemcitabine/vinorelbine may be considered in the design of future randomized, Phase III trials for patients with carcinomas of unknown primary site. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here