z-logo
Premium
Recombinant interferon γ1b immune enhancement in 20 patients with hematologic malignancies and systemic opportunistic infections treated with donor granulocyte transfusions
Author(s) -
Safdar Amar,
Rodriguez Gilhen H.,
Lichtiger Benjamin,
Dickey Burton F.,
Kontoyiannis Dimitrios P.,
Freireich Emil J.,
Shpall Elizabeth J.,
Raad Issam I.,
Kantarjian Hagop M.,
Champlin Richard E.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.21929
Subject(s) - medicine , neutropenia , transplantation , gastroenterology , refractory (planetary science) , hematopoietic stem cell transplantation , granulocyte colony stimulating factor , absolute neutrophil count , cancer , sepsis , febrile neutropenia , surgery , chemotherapy , physics , astrobiology
BACKGROUND The response to antifungal therapy alone often is suboptimal in patients with cancer who have therapy‐refractory neutropenia, and even donor‐derived granulocyte transfusions (GTX) are not always successful. The authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of immune enhancement using recombinant interferon γ1b (rIFN‐γ1b) in patients with cancer who received GTX for refractory, systemic, opportunistic infections. METHODS Twenty recipients of high‐dose donor GTX (≈5.5 × 10 10 neutrophils per transfusion) who had received concurrent rIFN‐γ1b between October 2001 and December 2004 were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS The median age (± standard deviation [SD]) was 45 ± 17 years. Ten patients (50%) were men, 17 patients (85%) had leukemia, and 3 patients (15%) had myelodysplastic syndrome. The median ± SD Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 15 ± 4 (range, 7‐22). Most patients ( n = 18 patients; 90%) had recurrent or refractory cancer. In 6 patients (30%) who received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, GTX plus rIFN‐γ1b was given a median ± SD of 26 ± 100 days (range, 12‐372 days) after transplantation. Seventeen patients (85%) had neutropenia during GTX therapy. Five patients (25%) had possible invasive fungal infection, 3 patients (15%) had probable invasive fungal infection, and 11 patients (55%) had proven invasive fungal infection. One patient (5%) had refractory Pseudomonas aeruginosa sepsis. Eight patients (40%) received corticosteroids during GTX plus rIFN‐γ1b therapy. Patients received a median ± SD of 8 ± 7 GTX doses (range, 4‐28 doses) and 9 ± 7 rIFN‐γ1b doses (range, 1‐28 doses), for a mean ± SD cumulative dose (CD) of 400 ± 2621 μg. Other concomitant cytokines were granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (12 ± 3 doses; CD, 6720 ± 4721 μg) in 15 patients (75%) and granulocyte‐macrophage–colony stimulating factor (12 ± 9 doses; CD, 4750 ± 4410 μg) in 14 patients (70%). Four patients (20%) developed fever, and 2 patients (10%) developed skin rashes. Reversible liver dysfunction ( n = 3 patients; 15%) and tachycardia ( n = 1 patients; 5%) were considered rIFN‐γ1b‐associated adverse reactions; whereas, in 1 patient (5%), transient dyspnea was attributed to GTX. Four weeks after therapy started, 9 patients (45%) had complete or partial resolution of infection; and, in another 3 patients (15%), the invasive fungal infection had become stable. CONCLUSIONS The current results indicated that no serious adverse events were associated with rIFN‐γ1b immune enhancement in patients with systemic opportunistic infections who received donor GTX therapy. Cancer 2006. © 2006 American Cancer Society.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here