Premium
Disease biology rather than age is the most important determinant of survival of patients ≥ 60 years with acute myeloid leukemia treated with uniform intensive therapy
Author(s) -
Gupta Vikas,
Chun Kathy,
Yi QiLong,
Minden Mark,
Schuh Andre,
Wells Richard,
Brandwein Joseph
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.21006
Subject(s) - medicine , acute promyelocytic leukemia , myeloid leukemia , cytarabine , univariate analysis , leukemia , gastroenterology , daunorubicin , adverse effect , oncology , multivariate analysis , biochemistry , retinoic acid , gene , chemistry
BACKGROUND The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the outcome of patients ≥ 60 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated uniformly with high‐dose daunorubicin containing induction and modified high‐dose cytosine arabinoside containing postremission therapy, and to identify factors predictive of complete disease remission (CR) and survival. METHODS Between 1998 and 2002, the authors treated 117 newly diagnosed patients (acute promyelocytic leukemia excluded) with AML ≥ 60 years (median, 67 years; range, 60–82 years). Karyotype (Medical Research Council classification) at diagnosis was categorized as good risk ( n = 3), intermediate risk ( n = 69), adverse risk ( n = 26), and suboptimal/not done ( n = 19). A normal karyotype was seen in 41 patients and 40 (34%) had secondary AML. RESULTS The outcome of induction included the following: CR, 62 (53%); early death, 5 (4%); death during hypoplasia, 14 (12%); and resistant disease, 36 (31%). The 3‐year event‐free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 9% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3–16%) and 17% (95% CI, 9–29%), respectively. In a univariate analysis, cytogenetics, lactate dehydrogenase level, leukocyte count, and performance status were the significant factors for EFS and OS. Age was not a significant prognostic factor for either CR or survival. In a multivariate model, adverse‐risk cytogenetics, previous history of myelodysplastic syndrome or antecedent hematologic disorder, and high leukocyte count (> 30 × 10 9 /L) were independent adverse prognostic factors for survival. The impact of adverse karyotype on EFS and OS was time dependent and was observed after 50 and 150 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The authors concluded that candidacy for intensive therapy in older patients should be based on biologic features of disease and fitness, rather than on age. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.