Premium
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: The incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era
Author(s) -
Nilsson Bengt,
Bümming Per,
MeisKindblom Jeanne M.,
Odén Anders,
Dortok Aydin,
Gustavsson Bengt,
Sablinska Katarzyna,
Kindblom LarsGunnar
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.20862
Subject(s) - gist , medicine , incidence (geometry) , stromal tumor , imatinib mesylate , population , autopsy , surgery , stromal cell , imatinib , myeloid leukemia , optics , physics , environmental health
BACKGROUND Recent breakthroughs regarding gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and their pathogenesis have redefined diagnostic criteria and have led to the development of molecularly targeted drug therapy. New treatment options mandate more accurate information regarding the incidence, prevalence, clinical behavior, and prognostic factors of GIST. METHODS All patients ( n = 1460) who potentially had GIST diagnosed from 1983 to 2000 in western Sweden (population, 1.3–1.6 million) were reviewed, and 288 patients with primary GIST were identified. The incidence and prevalence of GIST were determined, and predictive prognostic factors, including current risk‐group stratifications, were analyzed statistically. RESULTS Ninety percent of GISTs were detected clinically due to symptoms (69%) or were incidental findings at surgery (21%); the remaining 10% of GISTs were found at autopsy. Forty‐four percent of symptomatic, clinically detected GISTs were categorized as high risk (29%) or overtly malignant (15%), with tumor‐related deaths occurring in 63% of patients and 83% of patients, respectively (estimated median survival, of 40 months and 16 months, respectively). Tumor‐related deaths occurred in only 2 of 170 of patients (1.2%) with very‐low‐risk, low‐risk, or intermediate‐risk tumors. The annual incidence of GIST was 14.5 per million. The prevalence of all GIST risk groups was 129 per million (31 per million for the high‐risk group and the overtly malignant group). CONCLUSIONS GIST has been under recognized: Its incidence, prevalence, and clinical aggressiveness also have been underestimated. Currently existing risk‐group stratification systems based on tumor size and mitotic rate delineate GIST patients who have a poor prognosis. Prognostication in patients with GIST can be refined using a proposed risk score based solely on tumor size and proliferative index. Cancer 2005. © 2005 American Cancer Society.