z-logo
Premium
Prostate‐specific antigen: A review of the validation of the most commonly used cancer biomarker
Author(s) -
Hernández Javier,
Thompson Ian M.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.20480
Subject(s) - overdiagnosis , medicine , prostate cancer , prostate specific antigen , prostate , disease , cancer , prostate cancer screening , oncology , biomarker , gynecology , biochemistry , chemistry
Abstract BACKGROUND The widespread use of prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) screening has had a tremendous impact on all aspects of the management of prostate carcinoma. Although PSA‐based screening has resulted in a stage migration to more organ‐confined tumors at the time of diagnosis, and has been temporally associated with a decrease in prostate carcinoma mortality, PSA screening is imperfect. A recent analysis of results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) has provided insight into the positive predictive value of PSA in the so‐called “normal” range. METHODS The history of the discovery, initial studies, and subsequent widespread application of PSA screening is reviewed. RESULTS The application of PSA for screening preceded the development of current prostate biopsy techniques and an upper limit of normal was established without complete disease ascertainment. More recent modifications of PSA‐based screening have been adopted clinically without sufficient validation. With current methods, overdiagnosis of clinically unimportant disease almost certainly occurs and high‐grade, aggressive disease may not be detected sufficiently early to allow successful treatment. CONCLUSIONS To the authors' knowledge, the optimal upper limit of normal for PSA for prostate carcinoma screening is unknown. New biomarkers of disease are needed; these must be linked with disease prognosis and must be validated in rigorously designed clinical trials. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here