Premium
Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of a low‐clearance, unilamellar liposomal formulation of lurtotecan, a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced leukemia
Author(s) -
Giles Francis J.,
Tallman Martin S.,
GarciaManero Guillermo,
Cortes Jorge E.,
Thomas Deborah A.,
Wierda William G.,
Verstovsek Srdan,
Hamilton Marta,
Barrett Emma,
Albitar Maher,
Kantarjian Hagop M.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.20132
Subject(s) - medicine , mucositis , pharmacokinetics , myeloid leukemia , leukemia , gastroenterology , pharmacology , myelodysplastic syndromes , chronic myelogenous leukemia , refractory (planetary science) , chemotherapy , bone marrow , urology , astrobiology , physics
BACKGROUND OSI‐211 is a low‐clearance, unilamellar liposomal formulation of a water‐soluble camptothecin analogue, lurtotecan. OSI‐211 has significant activity in severe combined immunodeficient mouse models of human leukemia. METHODS This study was conducted to define the dose‐limiting toxicities (DLT) and pharmacokinetics of OSI‐211 in patients with refractory myeloid leukemias. Patients with refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or chronic myelogenous leukemia in blastic phase (CML‐BP) were eligible. OSI‐211 was given as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes daily for 3 days. The starting dose was 1.5 mg/m 2 per day (4.5 mg/m 2 per course). The dose was escalated by 50% until Grade 2 toxicity was observed and then by 30–35% until the DLT was defined. Serial plasma and urine samples were collected, and drug levels were determined by high‐performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. RESULTS Twenty patients (18 patients [90%] with AML, and 1 patient each [5%] with MDS and CML‐BP) were treated. Mucositis and diarrhea were considered to be the DLTs. The maximum tolerated dose was 3.7 mg/m 2 per day. Fourteen of 18 evaluable patients (78%) with AML or MDS achieved transient bone marrow aplasia. The mean systemic clearance of lurtotecan in plasma was 0.946 ± 1.53 L/hour/m 2 . Urinary recovery of lurtotecan was 6.66% ± 5.26% (range, 1.05–18.4%). CONCLUSIONS Liposomal encapsulation of lurtotecan altered its metabolism significantly. There was no evident correlation between exposure, as measured by plasma pharmacokinetics of lurtotecan, and clinical response or toxicities. OSI‐211 merits further study in hematologic malignancies. Cancer 2004;100:1449–58. © 2004 American Cancer Society.