Premium
Classifying local disease recurrences after breast conservation therapy based on location and histology
Author(s) -
Huang Eugene,
Buchholz Thomas A.,
Meric Funda,
Krishnamurthy Savitri,
Mirza Nadeem Q.,
Ames Frederick C.,
Feig Barry W.,
Kuerer Henry M.,
Ross Merrick I.,
Singletary S. Eva,
McNeese Marsha D.,
Strom Eric A.,
Hunt Kelly K.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.10952
Subject(s) - medicine , breast conserving surgery , breast cancer , radiation therapy , ductal carcinoma , histology , carcinoma , mastectomy , retrospective cohort study , oncology , cancer , surgery
BACKGROUND To distinguish true local recurrences (TR) from new primary tumors (NP) and to assess whether this distinction has prognostic value in patients who develop ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (IBTR) after breast‐conserving surgery and radiotherapy. METHODS Between 1970 and 1994, 1339 patients underwent breast‐conserving surgery at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center for ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma. Of these patients, 139 (10.4%) had an IBTR as the first site of failure. For the 126 patients with clinical data available for retrospective review, we classified the IBTR as a TR if it was located within 3 cm of the primary tumor bed and was of the same histologic subtype. All other IBTRs were designated NP. RESULTS Of the 126 patients, 48 (38%) patients were classified as NP and 78 (62%) as TR. Mean time to disease recurrence was 7.3 years for NP versus 5.6 years for TR ( P = 0.0669). The patients with NP had improved 10‐year rates of overall survival (NP 77% vs. TR 46%, P = 0.0002), cause‐specific survival (NP 83% vs. TR 49%, P = 0.0001), and distant disease‐free survival (NP 77% vs. TR 26%, P < 0.0001). Patients with NP more often developed contralateral breast carcinoma (10‐year rate: NP 29% vs. TR 8%, P = 0.0043), but were less likely to develop a second local recurrence after salvage treatment of the first IBTR (NP 2% vs. TR 18%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Patients with NP had significantly better survival rates than those with TR, but were more likely to develop contralateral breast carcinoma. Distinguishing new breast carcinomas from local disease recurrences may have importance in therapeutic decisions and chemoprevention strategies. This is because patients with new carcinomas had significantly lower rates of metastasis than those with local disease recurrence, but were more likely to develop contralateral breast carcinomas. Cancer 2002;95:2059–67. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10952