Premium
Long‐term follow‐up of patients with giant cell tumor of the sacrum treated with selective arterial embolization
Author(s) -
Lin Patrick P.,
Guzel Volkan B.,
Moura Marcio F.,
Wallace Sidney,
Benjamin Robert S.,
Weber Kristin L.,
Morello Frank A.,
Gokaslan Ziya L.,
Yasko Alan W.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.10803
Subject(s) - medicine , sacrum , embolization , vascularity , surgery , arterial embolization , magnetic resonance imaging , radiology , radiography
BACKGROUND Giant cell tumors of the bone can behave as aggressive and sometimes lethal tumors. In the sacrum, the tumor can be extremely difficult to manage. Standard treatments, including surgery and radiation, are associated with significant complications and recurrence rates. The goal of this study is to evaluate the long‐term outcome of selective arterial embolization as an alternative treatment modality. METHODS From 1975 to 2001, 18 patients were treated with selective intraarterial embolization. The embolization method was a combination of Gelfoam particles and coils for peripheral and central occlusions, respectively. The number of embolizations was based on clinical symptoms, radiographic response, and the vascularity of the tumor. Nine patients received intraarterial cisplatin as part of their treatment. The median follow‐up was 105 months. RESULTS Of 18 patients, 14 responded favorably to embolization with improvement in pain and neurologic symptoms. Computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging scans showed reossification and stabilization of tumor size. Arteriograms showed diminished vascularity. With long‐term follow‐up, three patients developed late disease recurrences within the sacrum. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the risk of local recurrence is 31% at 10 years and 43% at 15 and 20 years. The long‐term outcome was not affected by intraarterial cisplatin. There was one death that occurred 1 day after embolization. CONCLUSIONS Most patients demonstrate an objective early radiographic response to embolization. Long‐term follow‐up shows that the response is durable in approximately one half of the patients. Given the potential morbidity of other treatments, embolization should be included in the armamentarium of treatment for this difficult disease. Embolization may be used alone or in conjunction with other therapy. Long‐term follow‐up is recommended for all patients because late disease recurrence or sarcomatous change can occur. Cancer 2002;95:1317–25. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10803