z-logo
Premium
Socioeconomic and demographic disparities in treatment for carcinomas of the colon and rectum
Author(s) -
VanEenwyk Juliet,
Campo Joseph S.,
Ossiander Eric M.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
cancer
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.052
H-Index - 304
eISSN - 1097-0142
pISSN - 0008-543X
DOI - 10.1002/cncr.10645
Subject(s) - medicine , socioeconomic status , quartile , rectum , colorectal cancer , odds ratio , cancer registry , cancer , confidence interval , adjuvant therapy , demography , surgery , gynecology , gerontology , population , environmental health , sociology
BACKGROUND The current study examined the relationship between socioeconomic and demographic factors and type of treatment for carcinomas of the colon and rectum. The National Institutes of Health and the National Cancer Institute recommend surgery followed by adjuvant chemo‐ and/or radiotherapy for Stage III colon and Stages II and III rectal carcinomas. METHODS The authors linked Washington State's cancer registry and hospital discharge records and U.S. census data to assess socioeconomic and demographic factors related to treatment, controlling for clinical factors. RESULTS Compared to colon carcinoma patients under age 65 years, patients aged 75–84 years and 85 years or older were at higher risk for a treatment plan of surgery without adjuvant therapy (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.3–4.7; OR = 14.1, CI = 6.3–31.4, respectively). Risk of no adjuvant therapy was more than doubled for patients in zip codes in the lowest quartile of per capita income compared to the top three quartiles (OR = 2.3, CI = 1.5–3.4) and for those with Medicare compared to private insurance (OR = 2.2, CI = 1.3–3.8). Older patients with rectal carcinoma were also at higher risk of a treatment plan that did not include adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS The current findings suggest disparities in the provision of recommended medical procedures related to socioeconomic and demographic factors. Cancer 2002;95:39–46. © 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10645

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here