Open AccessTissue angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors: Are they more effective than serum angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors?
Author(s) -
Shah Apurva D.,
Arora Rohit R.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
clinical cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.263
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1932-8737
pISSN - 0160-9289
DOI - 10.1002/clc.4960281203
Subject(s) - medicine , ramipril , perindopril , ace inhibitor , angiotensin converting enzyme , heart failure , bradykinin , myocardial infarction , cardiology , renin–angiotensin system , enzyme inhibitor , pharmacology , coronary artery disease , enzyme , blood pressure , biochemistry , chemistry , receptor
Abstract Since their discovery in the 1980s, angiotensin‐converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to decrease angiotensin formation, prevent breakdown of bradykinin, and may also act on peptides of the renin‐angiotensin system. They are effective in reducing the risk of heart failure, myocardial infarction, and death from cardiovascular causes in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction or heart failure, and have been shown to reduce atherosclerotic complications in patients who have vascular disease without heart failure. They may preserve endothelial function and counteract initiation and progression of atherosclerosis. Broadly, ACE inhibitors can be divided into tissue specific or serum ACE inhibitors. Tissue‐specific ACE inhibitors as a group are not superior to serum ACE inhibitors in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Pending direct comparator clinical trials between a tissue ACE inhibitor and a plasma ACE inhibitor, both ramipril and perindopril can be recommended for secondary risk prevention, based on the evidence.