Open AccessEvaluation of serial QT dispersion in patients with first non‐Q‐wave myocardial infarction: Relation to the severity of underlying coronary artery disease
Author(s) -
Lyras T. G.,
Papapanagiotou V. A.,
Foukarakis M. G.,
Panou F. K.,
Skampas N. D.,
Lakoumentas J. A.,
Priftis C. V.,
Zacharoulis A. A.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
clinical cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.263
H-Index - 72
eISSN - 1932-8737
pISSN - 0160-9289
DOI - 10.1002/clc.4960260409
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , myocardial infarction , coronary artery disease , qt interval , electrocardiography
Abstract Background : Increased QT dispersion (QTD) has been correlated with ventricular arrhythmias. Recent reports suggest that it may serve as a marker of the severity of underlying coronary artery disease (CAD). Hypothesis : The aim of this study was to examine in‐hospital changes of QTD and their possible correlation with the severity of underlying CAD in patients with first non‐Q‐wave myocardial infarction. Methods : In 62 patients we estimated QTD, precordial QTD, as well as their values corrected for heart rate on Days 3 and 7 after admission. The severity of underlying ischemic burden was estimated by means of the number of diseased vessels as well as by the jeopardy score. Results : On Day 3, patients with jeopardy score ≥ 6 exhibited greater QTD, corrected QTD, precordial QTD, and corrected precordial QTD (p = 0.001, p = 0.003, p = 0.02, p = 0.036, respectively); patients with multivessel disease had greater QTD (p = 0.007). On Day 7, patients with jeopardy score ≥6 and multivessel disease exhibited greater QTD, corrected QTD, precordial QTD, and corrected precordial QTD (p < 0.001 for all). Multiple regression analysis revealed a jeopardy score of ≥ 6 as the most significant independent predictor for QTD variables. From Days 3 to 7, only patients with none or one diseased vessel or jeopardy score < 6 had shortened QTD (p = 0.01 and p = 0.015, respectively) and corrected QTD (p < 0.001 for both). Conclusions : In patients with first non‐Q‐wave myocardial infarction, QTD variables and their in‐hospital changes reflect the severity of underlying CAD.